There should be a rule change

for image spamming. If you only have a post with nothing in it with a picture, you get an infraction. Should be changed so that if the picture doesn't have a caption you get infracted, I see people type like "umad bro" and don't get infracted but every time I post a picture with a caption I get infracted. /tire

apparently, your post cant be more than....90% picture?
i dont remember the rule, but if there are no text (normal typing) above or below the picture, you get infraction.

Or if I post an emoticon or a relevant picture.

It's SPAM if it's annoying and repetitive. It's one thing to have image wars.

Yes yes and yes.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Or if I post an emoticon or a relevant picture.

It's SPAM if it's annoying and repetitive. It's one thing to have image wars.

It is relevant, I get pictures that has what I was going to say in them, not like the pictures are completely blank.

Originally Posted by InCognito

It is relevant, I get pictures that has what I was going to say in them, not like the pictures are completely blank.

That's the point I'm pushing. It's spam only if it's irrelevant, or it's repetitive.

It should. But only emoticans should be the "image spam"

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

That's the point I'm pushing. It's spam only if it's irrelevant, or it's repetitive.

Totally agree with you man
Gms are gettn a lil bit strict and are gonna kill the site...

Originally Posted by InCognito

That's just retarded. I think it should be revised to no more then 3 consecutive image-only posts.

Totally agree with this sir

Originally Posted by InCognito

Kinda weird. If you wrote "Do not want" instead of posting that picture you wouldnt have been infracted. Makes no sense.

That would be a bit too harsh.

Well yeah, I do agree that they should do so. But at least the average user posting an image should post something along their post as well. Just saves the infraction.

There should be a rule change

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread