Infraction for complimenting someone's artwork.

Yesterday, Gab(xxModz) posted a piece of art work, and I complimented on it, saying basically if there was literally shit on the piece, that it still would be too good to call it shit, and I got infracted for it.

The post was here:

http://www.mpgh.net/forum/148-showro...ml#post5394250

I'm sure we can get this cleared.

@xXModz
@Liz
@Dave84311
@arunforce

AND THE TABLES HAVE TURNED

@Toxin I agree you shouldn't have been infracted, but maybe next time word it slightly differently? Maybe if you said "If I took a shit on this, I still couldn't call it shit".

But still that is a compliment and the infraction should be reversed.

Originally Posted by Lehsyrus

Isn't that exactly what I said?

Originally Posted by Toxin

Isn't that exactly what I said?

It's basically what you said, but if someone didn't take in account for the apostrophe+t in couldn't and forgot the n somehow (or just forgot their glasses) I can understand how they would get confuse taking a quick glance over.

I still stand by the reversal of the infraction though

You know the deal, if you dont want people to misunderstand you, phrase shit noob friendly. You were staff, there should be no disputes from you.

I already told you why I infracted you.

It was interpreted by me as his sig wasn't worth shit.

Toodles.

Infraction for complimenting someone's artwork.

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread