I can make a homemade explosive for less than 20$ that could have taken the entire school out. Best part is, the instructions are online. Banning guns won't do shit.
---------- Post added at 01:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:35 AM ----------
Now find the documents listing how many citizens (excluding milita personnel) have ammunition. Those statistics are for specialized weaponry for in-combat engagement, not personal weaponry for recreational purposes.
Learn the definition of appreciate. Jesus Christ...
define: appreciate
ap·pre·ci·ate
/əˈprēSHēˌāt/
Verb
- Recognize the full worth of.
You're right. We should legalize owning all weapons. After all, they can be forged be people, who kill people. The difficulty of access and monitoring of allocation of these materials will contribute nothing at all to creating a safer country.
Last edited by radnomguywfq3; 12-14-2012 at 11:51 PM.
There are two types of tragedies in life. One is not getting what you want, the other is getting it.
If you wake up at a different time in a different place, could you wake up as a different person?
If anything we're going to see nutballs going for bigger game if we ban guns. With guns people shoot up other people, but they're content after or if they aren't they're pretty noticeable enough to catch. Many times they just kill themselves. But if we ban guns, then we have the nutballs who now have to spend more time preparing and creating weaponry, which will probably be explosives. If this is the case, we can expect larger massacres.
It's not the countries laws. It's how we portray incidents in this country. The majority of the Media rarely shows good shit, they only show the bad to get ratings. This has a negative impact on the people as a whole. If everyday we see "another man was pushed in front of a train" or "hurricane sandy is making thousands of lives miserable" or "madmen wanted to kill celebrity" then of course people are going to be fucked up because it makes them believe this behavior is normal.
It's all sociology.
Bernard (12-15-2012)
No. Do I believe that over-powered weaponry should be available to the general public? Absolutely not. Do I believe the general public has the right to own their own firearms? Absolutely. People have been able to wield their own weaponry since the dawn of man, just because this is a "different age" with "different weaponry" does not change this fact. Humans have the right to be able to defend themselves, or at the very least hunt, which they will no longer be able to do as efficiently if stricter gun laws are in effect.
What you have been proposing is stripping people of one of their freedoms due to the actions of one or a select few people. That's the equivalent of someone raping a girl and the government saying "well now we have to cut off every man's dick because one person couldn't use it properly".
Assault rifles? Unnecessary to civilians. Rifles/pistols/shotguns (non-automatic)? Perfectly acceptable. As I said before, for 20$ measly bucks I can make an explosive that can do more damage than that bushmaster.
Bernard (12-15-2012)
Semi-automatic, they definitely do not need a fully automatic AR. If for any reason they needed to upgrade it to full Auto in an emergency situation (outside invasion) they can be supplied with simple response triggers to upgrade it to full auto. No one has a need for a bushmaster.
Bernard (12-15-2012)
I saw this on Kim Kardasians Facebook, and its all over my Subscribers feed on my phone, and the thing that sucks about it that all those kids where excited for Christmas to get gifts and have fun this is what they get because of one dumb fuck that ruined families.
Last edited by [SMA] Paradise`; 12-15-2012 at 12:47 AM.
I seriously couldn't care less. Similar sort of stuff happens all over the world and nothing gets done about it.
Bernard (12-15-2012)