Home › Forum › MultiPlayer Game Hacks & Cheats › Console Game Hacking › Xbox Hacking › XBOX General Discussion › Welp
Welp
Welp
Got Halo 4. If you want to play, add my Gamertag: iBlitzcrank.
You Blitzcrank?
How about we play LoL instead.
How about we play LoL instead.
oh that was you? COD or FIFA not Halo /=.=
Come off that, Zen. They could repackage MW3 as MW4 and people would still buy that trash. It's either Halo or Battlefield.
It might be repackaged but thats why people continue to play it, they know what they're going to get, they like the security of not buying a game they don't know if it's good or bad. Personally I prefer FIFA but none of my friends play it, plus never really got into Halo.
Originally Posted by Zen
It might be repackaged but thats why people continue to play it, they know what they're going to get, they like the security of not buying a game they don't know if it's good or bad. Personally I prefer FIFA but none of my friends play it, plus never really got into Halo.
And across nine years, straddling two console generations, Bungie shipped five Halo titles, laying the technological and gameplay foundations that allowed first-person shooters to migrate from their natural home on PC onto console. Bungie redefined multiplayer combat in the process, championing both online and local split-screen action and introducing co-op elements to the campaign that other developers still struggle to match. Halo didn't just mimic PC shooter gameplay, it massively expanded upon it, creating an engine designed from the ground up to accommodate a massive variation in battle types, from the standard, linear corridor shooter to what it dubbed the sandbox - vast terrains packed with troops, ground vehicles, sky battles and latterly, even clashes amongst the stars. Behind the graphics tech, Bungie worked hard on state-of-the-art AI in order to create the sense that this was a genuine conflict on an epic scale. IW's and Treyarch's Call of Duty titles have had major issues competing in this category, as NPC's movements are obviously robotic, scheduled, predictable, and unconvincing.
I seriously suggest you pick up on Halo. To get the best understanding of the story, I'd suggest starting first with Halo: Reach (prequel to all Halo titles), then playing through 1, 2, 3, and 4. In all seriously, it hands-down has one of the best, most unique stories in gaming history.
Originally Posted by Killian
I'm sorry man, but that makes no sense. "Oh, hey, it's the newest CoD title! I think it's got the same guns, generic map designs, and same engine since Call of Duty 2! Let's go cough up $60 for the same thing!" That's why I like Battlefield. Each game adds something entirely new or drastically improves upon old features. Call of Duty will never compete with the capabilities of DICE's Frostbite.
And across nine years, straddling two console generations, Bungie shipped five Halo titles, laying the technological and gameplay foundations that allowed first-person shooters to migrate from their natural home on PC onto console. Bungie redefined multiplayer combat in the process, championing both online and local split-screen action and introducing co-op elements to the campaign that other developers still struggle to match. Halo didn't just mimic PC shooter gameplay, it massively expanded upon it, creating an engine designed from the ground up to accommodate a massive variation in battle types, from the standard, linear corridor shooter to what it dubbed the sandbox - vast terrains packed with troops, ground vehicles, sky battles and latterly, even clashes amongst the stars. Behind the graphics tech, Bungie worked hard on state-of-the-art AI in order to create the sense that this was a genuine conflict on an epic scale. IW's and Treyarch's Call of Duty titles have had major issues competing in this category, as NPC's movements are obviously robotic, scheduled, predictable, and unconvincing.
I seriously suggest you pick up on Halo. To get the best understanding of the story, I'd suggest starting first with Halo: Reach (prequel to all Halo titles), then playing through 1, 2, 3, and 4. In all seriously, it hands-down has one of the best, most unique stories in gaming history.
Originally Posted by Killian
I'm sorry man, but that makes no sense. "Oh, hey, it's the newest CoD title! I think it's got the same guns, generic map designs, and same engine since Call of Duty 2! Let's go cough up $60 for the same thing!" That's why I like Battlefield. Each game adds something entirely new or drastically improves upon old features. Call of Duty will never compete with the capabilities of DICE's Frostbite.
And across nine years, straddling two console generations, Bungie shipped five Halo titles, laying the technological and gameplay foundations that allowed first-person shooters to migrate from their natural home on PC onto console. Bungie redefined multiplayer combat in the process, championing both online and local split-screen action and introducing co-op elements to the campaign that other developers still struggle to match. Halo didn't just mimic PC shooter gameplay, it massively expanded upon it, creating an engine designed from the ground up to accommodate a massive variation in battle types, from the standard, linear corridor shooter to what it dubbed the sandbox - vast terrains packed with troops, ground vehicles, sky battles and latterly, even clashes amongst the stars. Behind the graphics tech, Bungie worked hard on state-of-the-art AI in order to create the sense that this was a genuine conflict on an epic scale. IW's and Treyarch's Call of Duty titles have had major issues competing in this category, as NPC's movements are obviously robotic, scheduled, predictable, and unconvincing.
I seriously suggest you pick up on Halo. To get the best understanding of the story, I'd suggest starting first with Halo: Reach (prequel to all Halo titles), then playing through 1, 2, 3, and 4. In all seriously, it hands-down has one of the best, most unique stories in gaming history.
I've never ever been a fan of Call of Duty's single player, except when I was younger, and the only Online FPS i played was Warrock, which I was sad to discovered finally sold out totally and now only officially a European game (fuck you K2 Games). Their single player is greatly lacking, the entire campaign feels less creative then the art episode of Dilbert.
How could you have assumed I've never played Halo? We go back almost two years of knowing each other, how can anyone say they're an Xbox gamer and not have played Halo. I personally am a fan of CoD4, the most bare-boned of the recent cods, all these killstreaks and death streaks, game modes and weapon configurations are just their attempt at trying way to hard, and over burden the game with non-essentials.
Originally Posted by Killian
Come off that, Zen. They could repackage MW3 as MW4 and people would still buy that trash. It's either Halo or Battlefield.
Originally Posted by Killian
I'm sorry man, but that makes no sense. "Oh, hey, it's the newest CoD title! I think it's got the same guns, generic map designs, and same engine since Call of Duty 2! Let's go cough up $60 for the same thing!" That's why I like Battlefield. Each game adds something entirely new or drastically improves upon old features. Call of Duty will never compete with the capabilities of DICE's Frostbite.
And across nine years, straddling two console generations, Bungie shipped five Halo titles, laying the technological and gameplay foundations that allowed first-person shooters to migrate from their natural home on PC onto console. Bungie redefined multiplayer combat in the process, championing both online and local split-screen action and introducing co-op elements to the campaign that other developers still struggle to match. Halo didn't just mimic PC shooter gameplay, it massively expanded upon it, creating an engine designed from the ground up to accommodate a massive variation in battle types, from the standard, linear corridor shooter to what it dubbed the sandbox - vast terrains packed with troops, ground vehicles, sky battles and latterly, even clashes amongst the stars. Behind the graphics tech, Bungie worked hard on state-of-the-art AI in order to create the sense that this was a genuine conflict on an epic scale. IW's and Treyarch's Call of Duty titles have had major issues competing in this category, as NPC's movements are obviously robotic, scheduled, predictable, and unconvincing.
I seriously suggest you pick up on Halo. To get the best understanding of the story, I'd suggest starting first with Halo: Reach (prequel to all Halo titles), then playing through 1, 2, 3, and 4. In all seriously, it hands-down has one of the best, most unique stories in gaming history.
One thing I hate about halo 4 AND battlefield 4 (yes 4 not 3), may be the only thing I hate about those games (except the boltshot in halo 4, most annoying thing ever) IS THE DAMN THEME SONG. They changed the awesome halo theme song to some bullcrap and now they are changing the battlefield theme song that has been there since forever man. I mean what the eff??
(just listen to it man @.@ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE6MJweDscQ)
EDIT: damn copy paste, it messed up my color
I'm down for some halo GT: Rizqn
Similar Threads
- 2Last post
- 16Last post
- 4Last post
- 6Last post
- 6Last post