Mine is different, its more indepth, it has more words, not the same "exact" god can you actually read? Mines better because it gives examples and shit Dont be @Tide when he was Lunari with 10posts.
Originally Posted by Kevin
Mine is different, its more indepth, it has more words, not the same "exact" god can you actually read? Mines better because it gives examples and shit Dont be @Tide when he was Lunari with 10posts.
It's pretty much the exact same thread, the first 50 words in both images are identical. Yours goes a little bit more in depth, but the threads are still the same.
Originally Posted by Snowkip
It's pretty much the exact same thread, the first 50 words in both images are identical. Yours goes a little bit more in depth, but the threads are still the same.
they aren't the same, mine is different
Originally Posted by Kevin
they aren't the same, mine is different
The image is slightly different, the threads are exactly the same though. Literally no difference. It's obvious you're just spamming to get more posts.
To bad the image is completely missleading. Its entirely possible to have an infinite nonrepeating decimal using only a few characters.
Y u posting old stuff 8[
Originally Posted by Doc
To bad the image is completely missleading. Its entirely possible to have an infinite nonrepeating decimal using only a few characters.
I imagine if a certain method for obtaining the outcome characters was used, it would be entirely possible. Such as binary code, which has the possibility to create complex codes, with patterns of only 2 finite characters.