Genocide

[[MPGH]Dave84311]

Would I kill an entire group of people? No.

[Paladin]

Can you honestly sit there and tell me you could justify killing an entire group of people because you believe these kinds of things?

Can you honestly say that a bad apple ruins a barrel of apples?

[Contribution]

I say fuck technology and lets go back uncivilized. I think that was the best time for humanity.

Can you honestly sit there and tell me you could justify killing an entire group of people because you believe these kinds of things?

Can you honestly say that a bad apple ruins a barrel of apples?

Only if that bad apple is contagious. I also think people with diseases should be killed to stop the spreading. Like they should kill everyone with STD's and problems they will never heal from. Its a waste of time, money, and space.

[THE J0KER]

I say fuck technology and lets go back uncivilized. I think that was the best time for humanity.


Only if that bad apple is contagious. I also think people with diseases should be killed to stop the spreading. Like they should kill everyone with STD's and problems they will never heal from. Its a waste of time, money, and space.

No, no, Best time for humanity was when there was little technology among civilians. Almost like the '70s, there was technology, just nothing advanced - and it was unpopular compared to today's use of technology.

[Youtro]

Go ahead.. After all, you're right. The more advanced and evolved people will survive

[Gray]

Or maybe you could just perish? Then you would have no world to hate anymore.

Rather take it down with me.

[WarAndRuin.]

The simple answer is yes,

For various reasons and various countries.

but then doing it is a iffy, there are still many of innocent to be spared.

[Paladin]

Only if that bad apple is contagious. I also think people with diseases should be killed to stop the spreading. Like they should kill everyone with STD's and problems they will never heal from. Its a waste of time, money, and space.

So instead of just preventing the spread of STDs in carriers, you'd just kill them?

[Kallisti]

So instead of just preventing the spread of STDs in carriers, you'd just kill them?

He's Ethen, please don't expect anything worthwhile coming from him.

[Contribution]

So instead of just preventing the spread of STDs in carriers, you'd just kill them?

Yes, the disease will seize to exist and there will be less money wasted.

[Kallisti]

Yes, the disease will seize to exist and there will be less money wasted.

So basically you are saying that

If a house were to be infested with insects, instead of trying to get rid of the insects and prevent them from coming back, you would just burn the house down?

How wasteful

[BenXer]

what are you hitler?

[Contribution]

So basically you are saying that
If a house were to be infested with insects, instead of trying to get rid of the insects and prevent them from coming back, you would just burn the house down?
How wasteful

No, insects are a part of life.

[Kallisti]

No, insects are a part of life.

And diseases aren't? OK.

[Paladin]

Yes, the disease will seize to exist and there will be less money wasted.

You do realize it's less profitable to kill people than it is to put them to work for the rest of their life, right?