arma 2 vs cod

Arma is a milsim while COD is a arcade shooter

You do know arma 2 and COD aren't EVEN in the same league together COD is just a shoot em up game fun for 2 hours kind of game and arma is a hardcore military simulator that pushes you skill as a player in way's that are only new to us since arma has gotten attention only last year or so

As the people above said, go for ArmA 2 if you are interested in realism and have a couple of friends to play with (yeah, to me arma is no fun when playing alone), go for CoD if you want some fast paced action. I wouldnt reccomend either though, get arma 3 or wait for battlefield 4 (providing you have the hardware required).

EDIT: Thought you were looking for a game to buy, not just comparing the two.. Anyways you cant really compare them since they are completely different games. To be honest I never had crazy fun when playing arma, but cod is way worse... So between the two arma it is.

It depends on what you're looking for, ARMA 2 is a simulator, while COD is just a fun run and gun style of game. It depends on your style of play

This question like : Which better Mario or BF3

Mario is a classic, BF3 is good. They're actually both good

i dont relly like arma so i would say cod

They are completely different type of games. Yes, they are both FPS but other than that they show no similarities.

You can choose between them, but you can't compare them.

You cannot compare those games. COD games are more arcade, and Arma 2 is a realistic war simulator. 100% different. Love both series, but dont buy COD BO2. MW3 is better.

Are you serious? Cod games from MW3 and on sucked. They were taking the worst features from the previous game, removing the good features, adding more shitty features and making CoD games. Last game I liked on the cod series was MW2. But CoD 4 was top.