Quran: primary source?
So this really bothers me ALOT
All muslims keep saying that the quran is a primary source and written by the prophet himself, but honestly, here is what I want you to know:
Muhammed didn't write down the book, it were his disciples and the disciples OF those disciples who decided to do that.
They did not even have official permission by the prophet to put it down in a book-form, but they thought people would benefit from it, so they did.
This means the quran is a secondary source, not a primary source.
Now I'm writing this all very generally, but I can provide you with proof if you're really interested.
Why the fuck do people keep on bashing on the bible saying that their book is not originally written by a prophet or so, whilst the same thing counts for the quran?
All muslims keep saying that the quran is a primary source and written by the prophet himself, but honestly, here is what I want you to know:
Muhammed didn't write down the book, it were his disciples and the disciples OF those disciples who decided to do that.
They did not even have official permission by the prophet to put it down in a book-form, but they thought people would benefit from it, so they did.
This means the quran is a secondary source, not a primary source.
Now I'm writing this all very generally, but I can provide you with proof if you're really interested.
Why the fuck do people keep on bashing on the bible saying that their book is not originally written by a prophet or so, whilst the same thing counts for the quran?
