OutdatedAlexanderHack Bypasser

Posts 115 of 132 · Page 1 of 9
AlexanderHack Bypasser
This is a gmod bypass that change sv_allowcslua, sv_cheats, host_timescale to AH_Allowcslua, AH_Cheats, AH_Timescale.
And changes the flags. And creates identical copies. And nulls the callbacks for the new AH cvars.

no, my name is not Alexander. what u want

VirusScan from, Virustotal and Jotti.

The virusscans scanned the raw dll file, not the zip
Alexander_mpgh.net.zip8 KB · 3,916 downloads Scanning…
Does nothing to help if you ask for approve.
Meanwhile in Facepunch studios
"Eh garreh look at dis sheet "
"Gotta update mah motherfuckin GAC cuz dis thing is crappeh!"
"Sec just added some fuckin new cvar's to ban mothafuckah"
Quote Originally Posted by hagwart2 View Post
Meanwhile in Facepunch studios
"Eh garreh look at dis sheet "
"Gotta update mah motherfuckin GAC cuz dis thing is crappeh!"
"Sec just added some fuckin new cvar's to ban mothafuckah"
Detected..
Approved!
Approval requests are deleted
Nice Release ! Imma check this out.
Ya i really doubt Garry will get off his ass unless it benefits him in a way like money for example.
Quote Originally Posted by BigBadWilly View Post
Ya i really doubt Garry will get off his ass unless it benefits him in a way like money for example.
Banning people would make him money, if steam wasn't retarded
Just want to say I just quickly looked at this through HxD this looks suspicious "C:\Users\Sabertooth\documents\visual studio 2010\Projects\gmcl_FileSteal_win32\Release\gmcl_Fi leSteal_win32.pdb"
I don't get the point of all theses fucking Trolls accusing everyones bypass as a Rat
Quote Originally Posted by BigBadWilly View Post
I don't get the point of all theses fucking Trolls accusing everyones bypass as a Rat
I didn't say it was a RAT or that it was malicious I was just saying that this is where the file was created from "C:\Users\Sabertooth\documents\visual studio 2010\Projects\gmcl_FileSteal_win32\" and I would be wary of using something from a folder called gmcl_FileSteal_win32.
Do any of you think you could look at the source code and confirm it ?
Quote Originally Posted by BigBadWilly View Post
Do any of you think you could look at the source code and confirm it ?
We don't have the source for it and I don't know a reflector for dlls to get the source or I would.I don't understand why people don't just release the source at this point it's just leading to users getting infected.
Posts 115 of 132 · Page 1 of 9
This thread is closed for replies.

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread

None

Need help?