Topblast Menu Base V2 D3D {9, 10.x, 11} [x64/x86]

[mjrr1998]

ok so, how may i open this base in c++ so i can add some hacks and try my best to make a hack

[topblast]

Gonna get back into things so I decided to just run and inject your base into CA. This is what the menu looked like. Windows 7 32-Bit

Didn't change anything besides adding a MessageBox

@Flengo i missed that post somehow 0.0.
It looks like a problem with either D3D9 font distance or the textures and coords that make the font, i'll see where i went wrong and get back

the Error come from the D3D9Renderer::AddText. if u look in there you will see a line saying

loc.x += loc.z - loc.x - (2.f * data->m_Spacing * scale);

replace that with

loc.x += loc.z - loc.x;

The Spacing is being removed, so it is all together.

[MOST PLAYED]

Gonna get back into things so I decided to just run and inject your base into CA. This is what the menu looked like. Windows 7 32-Bit

Didn't change anything besides adding a MessageBox

YOUR COMING BACK?

[[LIL]Squirtle]

YOUR COMING BACK?

Highly doubt it, but he mentioned before that he do dabble in some coding every now and then. So I guess a comeback is completely possible, but most likely won't happen. Being a GM is a lot of work, he may not have a lot of time. But being the awesome coder he is, anything is possible.

[[MPGH]Flengo]

YOUR COMING BACK?

I AM ATTEMPTING TO CURRENTLY WHENEVER I HAVE TIME YES

Highly doubt it, but he mentioned before that he do dabble in some coding every now and then. So I guess a comeback is completely possible, but most likely won't happen. Being a GM is a lot of work, he may not have a lot of time. But being the awesome coder he is, anything is possible.

If I find the time yeah sure. Trying to, so maybe yeah. It'll probably start out with simple things again

Who is you

[goldxero]

trying to compile the files but its missing xnamath.h

[arun823]

@topblast

std::async(std::launch::async, [](){thr = std::thread(InitThread); });

You just defeated the purpose of using std::async by passing a std::thread parameter since async guarantees thread-safety and propagates exceptions across threads whilst std::thread doesn't.

std::async(std::launch::async, InitThread);

Will suffice

Also I noticed you're initializing threads within DllMain which creates deadlock issues and is inefficient. A good example would be the dining philosophers problem which can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_...ophers_problem

To fix the deadlock issue, just initialize the thread in another function and just initialize that function in DllMain.

I do not want to bashful about your base, but I don't know why you declare the entire std namespace but then use the prefix std:: around your code, it's inconsistent in my opinion.

[topblast]

@topblast

std::async(std::launch::async, [](){thr = std::thread(InitThread); });

You just defeated the purpose of using std::async by passing a std::thread parameter since async guarantees thread-safety and propagates exceptions across threads whilst std::thread doesn't.

std::async(std::launch::async, InitThread);

Will suffice

Also I noticed you're initializing threads within DllMain which creates deadlock issues and is inefficient. A good example would be the dining philosophers problem which can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_...ophers_problem

To fix the deadlock issue, just initialize the thread in another function and just initialize that function in DllMain.

I do not want to bashful about your base, but I don't know why you declare the entire std namespace but then use the prefix std:: around your code, it's inconsistent in my opinion.

Thanks for your view, and you're not bashful at all. This code was just the rushed finish on the base, the std::async was me testing the function for the first time in c++ alone with a few bugs that i notice are in this release but not in my hdd copy(d3d9 font for example).

The Idea behind the async function was to start a thread somewhat after DllMain returned, but was getting some deadlocks some where in the mix, i cannot remember where, could'f been when i had thr as a local variable and i didnt want to call detach() because i wanted it joinable.

[arun823]

Thanks for your view, and you're not bashful at all. This code was just the rushed finish on the base, the std::async was me testing the function for the first time in c++ alone with a few bugs that i notice are in this release but not in my hdd copy(d3d9 font for example).

The Idea behind the async function was to start a thread somewhat after DllMain returned, but was getting some deadlocks some where in the mix, i cannot remember where, could'f been when i had thr as a local variable and i didnt want to call detach() because i wanted it joinable.

Well with the deadlock solution I've given you, you should be fine, also as I've stated previously, std::async will catch those exceptions and handle them for you to prevent deadlocks as long as you don't initialize it within DllMain

[iamJon]

YOUR COMING BACK?

Hahaa, this made me laugh. The image I mean. I like how specific you were about the menu.