My Graphic Art Logo

[Organized Chaos]

Well the title says it all.
Here it is!

@IV2B @deflorate
CnC thanks

[IV2B]

Too many watermarks, it looks way too bumpy to me.
Plus, did you really add a copyright to it? ( the (c) )
Cause...if you did...you might as well use the right symbol lol. ©

[Organized Chaos]

Too many watermarks, it looks way too bumpy to me.
Plus, did you really add a copyright to it? ( the (c) )
Cause...if you did...you might as well use the right symbol lol. ©

It's thee one DA Adds cause I'm lazy and didnt feel like making one pls back off :{
Imma bout to bawl

[PandemicZ]

Looks really nice!

[Mokou-Sama]

Honestly looks real cool to me

[Eadwulf_]

The awesomeness..

[jackiego60]

It looks good but the watermark is very annoying.

[Mr.Seyeko]

Too many watermarks, it looks way too bumpy to me.
Plus, did you really add a copyright to it? ( the (c) )
Cause...if you did...you might as well use the right symbol lol. ©

Yo sometimes you come off just a bit harsh, i know that's not your intention but man.. gotta step back and look what you say, it can hurt some peoples feelings..

I really like this design its unique and it goes good with your name Organized Chaos.. Just the water marks were not really needed

[IV2B]

Yo sometimes you come off just a bit harsh, i know that's not your intention but man.. gotta step back and look what you say, it can hurt some peoples feelings..

I really like this design its unique and it goes good with your name Organized Chaos.. Just the water marks were not really needed

It's that i really hate people destroy their works with watermarks: want to add your devianart? You have a whole damn screen to do that, why'd you need to cover the 300x300 pixels of work you did? Also why'd you want to place a copyright text so close to your work when you have alot of space underneath? Nobody is going to play with it and nobody will try to sell it, so what's the point?

I can't even comment the logo properly because it's almost completely covered!
There seem to be many weird lines, for example between the inner circle and the four edges, the middle part is perfectly flat on a surface with shading, which is quite weird looking.

Of course if he logo was clean, i'd have posted a much better CnC, however he decided to put a giant bad looking watermark right in the middle of something with a copyright...you have no need to add a watermark to prove you are the owner and it kills your work, how wrong can that be?
Imagine something like that on the mona lisa's face, try to imagine if somebody copies the logo he used and painted it on top of such a famous painting, how pissed would people be?

...And that's why my CnC turned into a "do you even watermark?" harsh comment.

[Mr.Seyeko]

It's that i really hate people destroy their works with watermarks: want to add your devianart? You have a whole damn screen to do that, why'd you need to cover the 300x300 pixels of work you did? Also why'd you want to place a copyright text so close to your work when you have alot of space underneath? Nobody is going to play with it and nobody will try to sell it, so what's the point?

I can't even comment the logo properly because it's almost completely covered!
There seem to be many weird lines, for example between the inner circle and the four edges, the middle part is perfectly flat on a surface with shading, which is quite weird looking.

Of course if he logo was clean, i'd have posted a much better CnC, however he decided to put a giant bad looking watermark right in the middle of something with a copyright...you have no need to add a watermark to prove you are the owner and it kills your work, how wrong can that be?
Imagine something like that on the mona lisa's face, try to imagine if somebody copies the logo he used and painted it on top of such a famous painting, how pissed would people be?

...And that's why my CnC turned into a "do you even watermark?" harsh comment.

When you buy to put a watermark on your stuff on Da thats what it does..
i dont agree with watermarks either but hey man people do steal art work and especially unique logos like this and call it their own.

[IV2B]

When you buy to put a watermark on your stuff on Da thats what it does..
i dont agree with watermarks either but hey man people do steal art work and especially unique logos like this and call it their own.

Well, i didn't know DA automatically puts them, but then if a clean version isn't used anywhere and isn't seen by anobody, then why'd you ruin it in the first place?

I mean, having a way to prove that's your work is quite good indeed, but you'd want to use it somewhere then, wouldn't you? If i'd see anybody using it then it'd be easy to destroy his/her reputation by having the image on my own DA.

It just seems too much to me...it'd be like saying you made Coca Cola's logo.

[Organized Chaos]

Well, i didn't know DA automatically puts them, but then if a clean version isn't used anywhere and isn't seen by anobody, then why'd you ruin it in the first place?

I mean, having a way to prove that's your work is quite good indeed, but you'd want to use it somewhere then, wouldn't you? If i'd see anybody using it then it'd be easy to destroy his/her reputation by having the image on my own DA.

It just seems too much to me...it'd be like saying you made Coca Cola's logo.

Do you want to see it without the damn watermark?

[David.]

Do you want to see it without the damn watermark?

Yes Share It Without WaterMark

[IV2B]

Do you want to see it without the damn watermark?

I'd like to.

[Organized Chaos]

[COLOR="Purple" @David. @IV2B @Mr.Seyeko

Scholar I do know the middle part is a flat surface.
It's meant to look like that m8 @David.[/Color]