I won't use it
when you're not prescribed for it.
I know a guy who used aderall and yea...
he regrets it..
yes but only because i need to. it dont work
Previously, I had a prescription for it.
Why?
Posts 1–15 of 27 · Page 1 of 2
Post a Reply
Tags for this Thread
None
I've used it before when I fell behind in my projects/commissions its addictive if you don't actually have a prescription for it
Originally Posted by KillTheNoise
its addictive if you don't actually have a prescription for it
Shit's addictive regardless if you take a high enough dose.
I used to take it a little bit for school and shit, nor prescribed just when I got really behind on shit. It worked alright, but I wouldn't say it worked well for me.
Originally Posted by KillTheNoise
I've used it before when I fell behind in my projects/commissions its addictive if you don't actually have a prescription for it
Your logic is shitty.
Originally Posted by Azathᴏth
Your logic is shitty.
thanks I like your reasoning
I used it alot. Crush up some addy put it in a blunt or just snort it. I used to do it when i was nodding out on heroin
Originally Posted by KillTheNoise
thanks I like your reasoning
My appypollyloggies. Allow me to expand. Why would you assume that a legitimate prescription makes one immune to addiction when prescription drugs are responsible for the highest amount of drug related deaths/overdoses in the U.S of A. Regardless if you are aware of this fact, and seeing your flag perhaps you are not, why would you think legal documentation guards one against addiction despite the fact that the doctor prescribing drugs is responsible for monitoring the patient to prevent such an addiction. Perhaps you think that such individuals' biological constitution is different enough that they are in fact immune to addiction. How is such a mutation screened and tested for. Does this hypothetical mutation affect the effectiveness of the actual drug. So many questions arise.
Originally Posted by Azathᴏth
My appypollyloggies. Allow me to expand. Why would you assume that a legitimate prescription makes one immune to addiction when prescription drugs are responsible for the highest amount of drug related deaths/overdoses in the U.S of A. Regardless if you are aware of this fact, and seeing your flag perhaps you are not, why would you think legal documentation guards one against addiction despite the fact that the doctor prescribing drugs is responsible for monitoring the patient to prevent such an addiction. Perhaps you think that such individuals' biological constitution is different enough that they are in fact immune to addiction. How is such a mutation screened and tested for. Does this hypothetical mutation affect the effectiveness of the actual drug. So many questions arise.
I don't assume that having a prescription makes you immune I know that people can develop addictions to almost anything some people even get fucking addicted to panadols it's just when you have a prescription with a set amount your supposed to take makes it less likely to develop an addiction which would result from buying cut pills where some may have a higher potency than others and feeling you need to take extra to get that kick when in reality your just building up a tolerance. Also I ment it in a sense that if you are taking aderall its for someone with ADHD and I'm not going to try and detour someone from taking something they could need to function better. Admittedly I could have worded my post alot better and made my stance clearer.
Also I liked your old font why'd you change
Originally Posted by KillTheNoise
I don't assume that having a prescription makes you immune I know that people can develop addictions to almost anything some people even get fucking addicted to panadols it's just when you have a prescription with a set amount your supposed to take makes it less likely to develop an addiction which would result from buying cut pills where some may have a higher potency than others and feeling you need to take extra to get that kick when in reality your just building up a tolerance. Also I ment it in a sense that if you are taking aderall its for someone with ADHD and I'm not going to try and detour someone from taking something they could need to function better. Admittedly I could have worded my post alot better and made my stance clearer.
Also I liked your old font why'd you change
Ah, I see. Also, this has been my font for years, I don't recall changing it.
Originally Posted by Titan
Any of you use it?
Tried Aderall, found it to be a bit strong. Went with modafinil instead; use it casually. Some say it doesn't work for them (or they get just the side affects), though it works pretty well for me.
@Titan don't get addicted master It's not very good honestly. It's mildly addictive if you take too much at one time and you just more or less get fucked doing nothing important. Doesn't really help focus if you aren't ADHD/ADD.