DetectedCS 1.6 MultiHack

Posts 61–75 of 118 · Page 5 of 8
Quote Originally Posted by Doctorate View Post
goodjob
ddddddd2short
*tips fedora*
Settings keeps resetting after a while playing, and the default settings are shit
If you find working settings, please let me know. Close up combat isn't too bad, but far away the aimbot almost doesn't even work.
I know that this game is old, but do people still get VAC bans from this? As in if I use this in a match will I probably get VAC banned?
Quote Originally Posted by MuffMuffin View Post
any explanation??
Emm, false positive?

- - - Updated - - -

Quote Originally Posted by ScytheElement View Post
Detected Banned Today
Really? I haven't been banned yet lmao

- - - Updated - - -

Quote Originally Posted by Bug View Post
I know that this game is old, but do people still get VAC bans from this? As in if I use this in a match will I probably get VAC banned?
I mean... you're always taking a risk with any type of hacks (especially public cheats) just use with caution hf
I don't wanna sound all sassy, but I have a high security antivirus, so sadly I won't be using this any time soon.
Quote Originally Posted by MuffMuffin View Post
I don't wanna sound all sassy, but I have a high security antivirus, so sadly I won't be using this any time soon.
"I dont wanna sound all sassy, but I think I'm completely safe by using an antivirus that totally does not get any false positives"

Bitch please, only in the start of the computer era was antiviruses actually good, because at that point there wasn't enough technology to create super advanced viruses, they were easy to detect and used common methods. Unfortunately with all the new technology the older methods weren't even slighly usefull anymore, the only way to sort of 'detect' viral behaviour was by signature scanning and heuristics, both used commonly in up to date virusscanners, but these methods
will cause alot of false positives, mainly because alot of applications nowaday uses heuristics, especially hacks because they need the functions
labeled as 'heuristics', e.g ReadProcessMemory/WriteProcessMemory/OpenProcess.

I'm guessing the detection was probably something along the lines of WIN32/HEUR.Generic or similiar.
Anything with a .generic is generally not dangerous, they are only 'flagged' because of WINAPI functions and because it is a unknown application.

Furthermore please correct me if I have made any misstakes..
Quote Originally Posted by Yemiez View Post
"I dont wanna sound all sassy, but I think I'm completely safe by using an antivirus that totally does not get any false positives"

Bitch please, only in the start of the computer era was antiviruses actually good, because at that point there wasn't enough technology to create super advanced viruses, they were easy to detect and used common methods. Unfortunately with all the new technology the older methods weren't even slighly usefull anymore, the only way to sort of 'detect' viral behaviour was by signature scanning and heuristics, both used commonly in up to date virusscanners, but these methods
will cause alot of false positives, mainly because alot of applications nowaday uses heuristics, especially hacks because they need the functions
labeled as 'heuristics', e.g ReadProcessMemory/WriteProcessMemory/OpenProcess.

I'm guessing the detection was probably something along the lines of WIN32/HEUR.Generic or similiar.
Anything with a .generic is generally not dangerous, they are only 'flagged' because of WINAPI functions and because it is a unknown application.

Furthermore please correct me if I have made any misstakes..
Well said.
My antivirus has marked this as a dangerous trojan, any explanation??
How can i install it??
Anyone here how to set up the no recoil and aimbot
Posts 61–75 of 118 · Page 5 of 8
This thread is closed for replies.

Similar Threads

Talk with us