will try this
Outdated😎 PolyMeme V2 [PolyLoader] [ESP & Radar] [Fully External]
waiting for approving 
looks nice i will give it a try 
looks nice i will give it a try What actually makes this safe?
I've been away for a long while so I'm not going to pretend I know everything about whats going on right now.
Merccy's post states that he assumes it is a string based detection that caused the PolyHack detection, If this is correct then what makes yours any different?
You say that you use "Merccy's PolyLoader's string swapping and encryption" but all you have done is add some swaps. There is no runtime encryption at all.
ps. I'm back bitches.
I've been away for a long while so I'm not going to pretend I know everything about whats going on right now.
Merccy's post states that he assumes it is a string based detection that caused the PolyHack detection, If this is correct then what makes yours any different?
You say that you use "Merccy's PolyLoader's string swapping and encryption" but all you have done is add some swaps. There is no runtime encryption at all.
ps. I'm back bitches.
Originally Posted by Blueblood1
....
To elaborate on my earlier post, after more research apparently people have being going up to 2 months so far by replacing strings, Only string that remains constant is "csgo.exe", "client.dll" and "engine.dll". Simply because these can't be changed without a lot of effort.
If it is a string based detection it seems strange that these aren't causing VAC Bans unless its just super delayed.
Originally Posted by coconts
I like to enter in style. 
If it is a string based detection it seems strange that these aren't causing VAC Bans unless its just super delayed.
Originally Posted by coconts
What an entrance
Originally Posted by Blueblood1
To elaborate on my earlier post, after more research apparently people have being going up to 2 months so far by replacing strings, Only string that remains constant is "csgo.exe", "client.dll" and "engine.dll". Simply because these can't be changed without a lot of effort.
If it is a string based detection it seems strange that these aren't causing VAC Bans unless its just super delayed.
I like to enter in style.
If it is a string based detection it seems strange that these aren't causing VAC Bans unless its just super delayed.
I like to enter in style.
Originally Posted by l1m3w1r3
So how can we change that?
Due to there being a different PID on startup, it wouldn't be possible for VAC to just simply look for a certain number.
Originally Posted by Blueblood1
When you start a process, it gets its own unique process id (PID), we could potentially use that to remove the need for a string to target the process. Each PID is unique and different on startup, it would only be a matter of Launching Task Manager, getting the ID and updating a variable in the source.
Due to there being a different PID on startup, it wouldn't be possible for VAC to just simply look for a certain number.
Due to there being a different PID on startup, it wouldn't be possible for VAC to just simply look for a certain number.
.
Originally Posted by Blueblood1
When you start a process, it gets its own unique process id (PID), we could potentially use that to remove the need for a string to target the process. Each PID is unique and different on startup, it would only be a matter of Launching Task Manager, getting the ID and updating a variable in the source.
Due to there being a different PID on startup, it wouldn't be possible for VAC to just simply look for a certain number.
Due to there being a different PID on startup, it wouldn't be possible for VAC to just simply look for a certain number.
Originally Posted by Radu97
what about client and engine ?
.
.
clientStart = "cli";
clientContain = "ent";
clientEnd = ".dll";
All you would need to do is edit your memory class, Search for a module that starts with clientStart, contains clientContain and ends with clientEnd.
So long as you never piece all 3 parts together, The blacklisted word "client.dll" is never found.
This would be a temporary fix but should work.
- - - Updated - - -
Originally Posted by pean153
or just XOR runtime string encryption.. ?
Also passing the XOR encrypted string to a module finder would be a bit of hassle.
Originally Posted by Blueblood1
Splitting the name into 3 parts, clientStart, clientContain, clientEnd.
clientStart = "cli";
clientContain = "ent";
clientEnd = ".dll";
All you would need to do is edit your memory class, Search for a module that starts with clientStart, contains clientContain and ends with clientEnd.
So long as you never piece all 3 parts together, The blacklisted word "client.dll" is never found.
This would be a temporary fix but should work.
- - - Updated - - -
That works too but I'm faaaaaar to lazy for that shit.
Also passing the XOR encrypted string to a module finder would be a bit of hassle.
clientStart = "cli";
clientContain = "ent";
clientEnd = ".dll";
All you would need to do is edit your memory class, Search for a module that starts with clientStart, contains clientContain and ends with clientEnd.
So long as you never piece all 3 parts together, The blacklisted word "client.dll" is never found.
This would be a temporary fix but should work.
- - - Updated - - -
That works too but I'm faaaaaar to lazy for that shit.
Also passing the XOR encrypted string to a module finder would be a bit of hassle.
p.s welcome back. you have been missed
Originally Posted by Blueblood1
quote
Originally Posted by pean153
That was a guess tho, noone really knows what caused the banwave but there are many speculations. Welcome back, times have changed.
Awesome thanks for the post!
All the sudden stoped working for me??
This thread is closed for replies.
Similar Threads
Counter-Strike 2 HacksPolyMeme v1 [PolyHack] [Glow ESP] [Undetected] [Radar] [Fully External] 55 Counter-Strike 2 HacksPolyMeme v3 [PolyHack] [Fully External] [ESP & Radar] [PseudoFOV] 53 Counter-Strike 2 Hacks😎 A bit Smarter : Multihack 4.0 [Fully External] (Aimlock , ESP , OnlyHS Trigger etc)
134 Counter-Strike 2 HacksCreme De La Meme [Fully External] [Team ESP, Enemy ESP, NoFlash] 52 Call of Duty 6 - Modern Warfare 2 (MW2) HacksUndetected External ESP+Radar+Bot V4.1 - Build 1.0.184 167
134 Counter-Strike 2 HacksCreme De La Meme [Fully External] [Team ESP, Enemy ESP, NoFlash] 52 Call of Duty 6 - Modern Warfare 2 (MW2) HacksUndetected External ESP+Radar+Bot V4.1 - Build 1.0.184 167