Junior Warlock

Dedicated to @Roxy Lalonde

"I believe to some people this is magic..."
this section will thrive again!

CnC Please @Democritus @IV2B @Color @Etheral @Mokou-Sama @I Don't Love You @Etheral @EgoRaptor @ HalfBajan

How much time did you spend working on this? Or on any other pieces on average?

Originally Posted by Hova

How much time did you spend working on this? Or on any other pieces on average?

Usually anywhere from 2-5ish maybe 6
Mostly around the middle thou 3, 4, 5 ish

Why?

Originally Posted by Organized Chaos

Usually anywhere from 2-5ish maybe 6
Mostly around the middle thou 3, 4, 5 ish

Why?

Just curious how long it takes, it looks quite complex with many different elements. Thought it must take a while

Good Job.

Originally Posted by Hova

Just curious how long it takes, it looks quite complex with many different elements. Thought it must take a while

It does gg x.x

Interesting design. Actually seems like Proph when he is Roxy

I like it.

Originally Posted by Hunter's Sheep

Interesting design. Actually seems like Proph when he is Roxy

I know that's what I was secretly going for

*or when he's drunk*

that's amazing.

and i am happy when i m drunk

))

This tag is a slight downgrade and I'll try to explain why I think that.
Generally it's a good thread, revolves around 2-3 diferent colors and so in that department its good to go.
What you failed here is that the borders of the tag pop way more than the render, mainly because of the brightness and darkness in some parts, havind a higher contrast aspect in comparison with the middle where the render is.

What I suggest is put a layer on top with black around borders, and add as blending options: soft light or similar or screen. Reduce opacity or increase untli you feel the only point of the tag that catches your atention is the render. Or a certain element of the render.

Nonetheless it deserves something around 8,5/10

Originally Posted by Mokou-Sama

So it's bad because it has depth?

Originally Posted by Organized Chaos

So it's bad because it has depth?

It's bad because it has depth on wrong places.
Too many elements due to the c4d layers and you make then pop up instead of the little girl.
sort of.

Originally Posted by Mokou-Sama

It's bad because it has depth on wrong places.
Too many elements due to the c4d layers and you make then pop up instead of the little girl.
sort of.

I'd have to disagree.
A tag doesn't have to have depth just behind the the focal.

Originally Posted by Organized Chaos

I'd have to disagree.
A tag doesn't have to have depth just behind the the focal.

True story, but then it usually works that way if you invert the color tones, like brighter edges and the focal being darker. giving a real depth feeling.
But hey, this is just my opinion.

Junior Warlock

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread