Question about outdated source?

I have an old outdated garbage source code and now I updated it by myself.
Almost changed all variables, added some junk code to it and legit settings.

Will this hack I've made is going to be private hack or undetected by VAC?

I have built it and tested, work perfectly in -insecure mode(Disable VAC).
But I don't dare to test on real VAC server.

edited: this code is WPM/RPM.

Add some junk code, change the code around, and then test it on an account you don't mind losing.

Best chance you have without any coding experience is changing struct/function names, changing ProcMem, and adding junk code^^.

Originally Posted by HitByParkedCar

Best chance you have without any coding experience is changing struct/function names, changing ProcMem, and adding junk code^^.

do you think when the c++ code is compiled, the names are still "DoAimbot" and "DoGlow"? No, they aren't. Changing the order of the structs arounds and rearranging or adding junk code to the functions does help, but renaming does nothing.

So in theory some guy can nick peoples code and make they own personal cheat. kinda gay tbh

Originally Posted by HitByParkedCar

changing struct/function names

Why are you going around saying bullshit stuff all the time? Dont listen to him @OP.

@OP Try it on a smurf account, wait a week or two before judging if its detected or not, but remember there is always the chance you can get VAC'd.

Originally Posted by Yemiez

Why are you going around saying bullshit stuff all the time? Dont listen to him @OP.

@OP Try it on a smurf account, wait a week or two before judging if its detected or not, but remember there is always the chance you can get VAC'd.

Then how do PolyHacks get detected? :c

Originally Posted by HitByParkedCar

Then how do PolyHacks get detected? :c

Bytearrays with wildcards, string detection (Live strings, not static strings), general stuff like that.

Originally Posted by Yemiez

Bytearrays with wildcards, string detection (Live strings, not static strings), general stuff like that.

ah. I thought string detection meant static strings. Sorry.

Originally Posted by HitByParkedCar

ah. I thought string detection meant static strings. Sorry.

Function names aren't stored as strings anyway..

another question if the source is marked as detected cheat but if I recompile, change something in code.
will it going to be undetected?

Question about outdated source?

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread