OutdatedScripthook

I think this is really great actually. Yes there is reasonable chance of getting banned, but that's a fact everyone here should accept if you choose to hack.

Finally someone with the competence to make a working Hook for the public, unlike every other greedy, sketchy person who claims their ScriptHook is so much safer than all the others so you should pay 30$ for one.

People like me with several accounts that doesn't really care if they're banned or not, should be allowed to use this hook without everyone bitching about it. It's worth the fun.

I still think this should be removed. He didn't code ANY of this, there is a video tutorial on how to do this on Youtube. ON TOP OF THAT, It flat out says in the coding that it wasn't created by him. So why is there even a debate? This guy should have been removed from here as soon as they looked into the fact that he stole someone elses' scripts and claimed it as his own.

If he's allowed to get away with this, then I should be able to steal a menu, change the COLOR of it, and call it my own. (Not that I'd ever do that, Just proving a point)

1) Free hooks will always equal quicker bans than private/paid ones.
2) Private hooks use different methods unlike public/free hooks so you do pay for better protection. $30? You smoking some good shit, bro. The cheapest one is $7.50, the next is $10, and the final one is the most expensive and monthly fee ($20 or more).
3) Multiple accounts? I'm guessing some of those are compromised/hacked accounts.



He didn't steal anything. No one can actually make a script hook like Alexander Blade because no one has the full source code to it. Alex was never going to release the full source code because the code itself was too powerful and dangerous. We only have the .dll file, which is obfuscated anyway. No one can ever claim that a scripthook is there own because no one has the full source. Plus, like you said, it's obvious by the name that Alexander Blade made it, but everyone knows that ScriptHookV.dll = Alexander Blade.

This has happened on this website before anyway, so the mods are aware that this file is "acceptable"? Point being though that everyone already knows this is Alexander's work just modified, so no one is really stealing anything. This has just been slightly reverse-engineered to work online. Don't look any further into it, k?

If you were to do the latter in your post, then this community would see you as a "leech", "skid" or something worse. You'd get a negative reputation because you would be stealing someone's work in that example. However, like I mentioned before, no one can really steal Alex's work, so there is no stealing; just modifying of known code.

That's like me saying If I or anyone else took the "M*****" Mod Menu and redesigned it and put it on this site for redistribution, they're not stealing it, Just modifying known code. I'm not trying to say you're completely wrong, But it's the same concept no matter how you look at it.

That's not a good comparison because m***** is a paid menu. They also use an edited version of ScriptHook similar to this. People have used ScriptHook with an online bypass for a long time, why did it suddenly become an issue? It will be interesting to see how quickly this gets detected.

Okay you are trying to prove a point just because I used Menyoo as an example. Let me rephrase then. I grab Doge's Menu that is currently on this site, I leech it and redesign it, It's not my work but I'm still claiming it as MY WORK. It's still the same thing. Why redistribute it? Just to get better reputation on this website and feel like a big person?

And as I stated before, It's not even HIS WORK, he changed 6 letters/numbers in the coding to make it work online. There has been a Youtube video on how to do this for ages. He didn't come up with it, He found the video and used that. I guarantee it!!! I know because I tried it before.

Okay you are trying to prove a point just because I used Menyoo as an example. Let me rephrase then. I grab Doge's Menu that is currently on this site, I leech it and redesign it, It's not my work but I'm still claiming it as MY WORK. It's still the same thing. Why redistribute it? Just to get better reputation on this website and feel like a big person?

And as I stated before, It's not even HIS WORK, he changed 6 letters/numbers in the coding to make it work online. There has been a Youtube video on how to do this for ages. He didn't come up with it, He found the video and used that. I guarantee it!!! I know because I tried it before.

You're still redistributing someone else's work without their permission. On top of that, it wasn't because YOU recoded it or anything, You found a video, took that persons work also, then claimed it for your own.

Go ahead and redesign a menu's assembly code. Stuff on this site, just like AB's website isn't protected in any way. If people wanted to, they could jump into IDA, RE it and extract the required code. But guess what? There is no point reinventing the wheel. People have tried, some succeeded, but in the end, they weren't as good as ScriptHookV, so we might as well use what we've got, while we can. AB is the only one who really knows stuff like how to update the natives list, so we all use his work, but bitching on here won't get you anywhere.

does anyone acknowledge that scripthookv is open source and even has a link to the sdk on the official website? if someone wanted to the can look at the source itself and reconstruct it from there taking out online checks and what not. ive always doubted what the paid menus do. whether they hex edit the original scripthookv.dll to work online, jumble it, rename it, call it their own. or do they actually go through the sdk and try making a safer one. on a side note ni**** hook actually changes the tags to itself, and Men*** doesnt it just leaves the scripthook tags in place.