is moving code around and adding some fluff here and there really all it takes to change the signature?
PolyLoader 2.3.1
This is a very very good release/post! This is a very helpful 'tool', which is very simple to use! Good job 

To use this cheat i have to install 6gb file ?
I'm looking to implement polyloader for an upcoming public hack, but I'm sorta here to vent off my annoyance with the system.
I actually made a junk code generator myself (Albeit a lot more basic), and what I did was instead of using tags like "[add_junk /]", my implementation looked for "//>startjunk" and "//<stopjunk". This way, the altered source code remains compatible with IDEs, and will compile (without junk) through an IDE like visual studio. But when ran through the junk generator, it would then build a junk enabled exe.
This just made life a whole lot easier, as I can maintain and update the code, without having to go through the whole source and add tags when I want to move from IDE to junk generator.
Maybe allowing to put // in front of the code tags would be a good solution to this, and would certainly make my life a lot easier if I want to go ahead and use polyloader. Because as it is now, I am still looking around to see what kind of protections I want to implement.
I actually made a junk code generator myself (Albeit a lot more basic), and what I did was instead of using tags like "[add_junk /]", my implementation looked for "//>startjunk" and "//<stopjunk". This way, the altered source code remains compatible with IDEs, and will compile (without junk) through an IDE like visual studio. But when ran through the junk generator, it would then build a junk enabled exe.
This just made life a whole lot easier, as I can maintain and update the code, without having to go through the whole source and add tags when I want to move from IDE to junk generator.
Maybe allowing to put // in front of the code tags would be a good solution to this, and would certainly make my life a lot easier if I want to go ahead and use polyloader. Because as it is now, I am still looking around to see what kind of protections I want to implement.
Does this still work as planned?
All i need now is CS:GO
mucho opio
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe I'll use it
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe I'll use it
Link: Fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'LIBCMT.lib"
Can someone help me? i keep getting this error
Can someone help me? i keep getting this error
looks like all poly hack are dead... its true? i got vac banned 3 times, with 3 different poly source..
Does this still work?
Don't take this as a DETECTED! warning, most of the time after using poly hacks for about 2 weeks I get untrusted. just so you guys know, also if you guys didn't know untrusted means its usually the cheats fault, but poly hacks cant really fix it seems, Not like I could either so :P
So, im new to hacking, but can you give me some hack files? I dunno what i have to give the program.
looks like polyhack era was ended..
Thanks for this
nice !!!!!!!!!!!!!
This thread is closed for replies.
Similar Threads
Counter-Strike 2 DiscussionsPolyloader ProblemsRE 14 Counter-Strike 2 Hacks💡 Merccy's PolyLoader 2.0
1,315 Counter-Strike 2 DiscussionsPolyLoader 2.0 not compilingLO 3 Counter-Strike 2 DiscussionsWho wants me to make a better version of Merccy's Polyloader tutorial video?? 8 Counter-Strike 2 Coding & ResourcesDevelopers guide to Merccy's PolyLoader
3