PKEncoder ~ Encode your strings
Let's get this straight;
Companies, such as Sony pay millions and millions to improve their encryption, which ends up getting broke into. It's never secure, you are just burning performance.
Sending the encrypted data to a minion won't help and that proves nothing. Once you have access to an executable, especially .NET, don't expect to have the code secure. The way you are going to "hide" the number of loops will be the same exact way for the one reading the code to find it.
ConfuserEx is in no way that strong as you think is either, It will take you a few seconds to find unpackers for it. (Not even considering manual decryption for values).
Companies, such as Sony pay millions and millions to improve their encryption, which ends up getting broke into. It's never secure, you are just burning performance.
Sending the encrypted data to a minion won't help and that proves nothing. Once you have access to an executable, especially .NET, don't expect to have the code secure. The way you are going to "hide" the number of loops will be the same exact way for the one reading the code to find it.
ConfuserEx is in no way that strong as you think is either, It will take you a few seconds to find unpackers for it. (Not even considering manual decryption for values).
I understand. However as I said four times already I think,
this program is for people that just grab ILSpy and expect to get free source code.
Don't tell me that everyone on mpgh knows:
What base64 is
How to decode base64
How to write a .net application that does it for them.
Well it is for those people that don't know how to do it.
It's a minimal protection, but if you want to use it, well you can.
this program is for people that just grab ILSpy and expect to get free source code.
Don't tell me that everyone on mpgh knows:
What base64 is
How to decode base64
How to write a .net application that does it for them.
Well it is for those people that don't know how to do it.
It's a minimal protection, but if you want to use it, well you can.
You are right, in mpgh. The 91% of users in mpgh may not know how to get a solution because they are just desktop users, that's why. A real programming beginner would know what base64 is, how to decode it and understand that it is encoded many times. How? It's perfectly manually recognizable that your string is encoded many times in base64. If I use an online base64 decoder and try to decode your base64 string, I'd see if the charset is still
, if the string does still contain 2, 1 or 0
char at the end of the output for padding, and if the length is valid to be a base64 encoded one.
This thread is closed for replies.
