VMProtect or themida or etc working with dlls ( virtualize code )?
Regards
Protecters do not prevent VAC bans.
But it help with undetected, right? im totally newbie.
Originally Posted by K00ky
But it help with undetected, right? im totally newbie.
None of this protector shit has been proven to work...
Originally Posted by GRHGERHRHreherherherh
None of this protector shit has been proven to work...
So what really helps with dlls?
Originally Posted by K00ky
So what really helps with dlls?
Coding them yourself and keeping it to yourself is a place to start
Originally Posted by GRHGERHRHreherherherh
None of this protector shit has been proven to work...
That not quite true
Originally Posted by K00ky
But it help with undetected, right?im totally newbie.
Protecting your cheat with any of the packers doesn't help against static signature generation from disk.
Originally Posted by K00ky
If i change names of variables/class and add some junk code it's fine ? I'm seriously noob.
Unless you are writing managed code, changing variable names, function names or class names doesn't change the .text section at all. Your variables and functions as well as constructors, member variables/functions are all getting accessed by their address, not by their name.
Depends on what you use. If you can change a signature with it then it'll work for you. Just a simple thing such as adding some junk code wont help at all
If i change names of variables/class and add some junk code it's fine ? I'm seriously noob.
looks like OP likes sources
And ? Maybe stop comments like retard, just help
Originally Posted by K00ky
And ? Maybe stop comments like retard, just help
Changing Var names won't help. Junk Code works but you have to turn off optimizations. Just code it yourself or change some code around and you'll be good.