Server-side hacks.. /gulp

No such thing. You cant access the server, therefore you cant have a "server-side hack". All hacks, proxy and directly in the client, are considered client-side hacks.




Although i guess a case could be made to argue that things like duping are "server-side hacks". But id consider those more along the lines of an exploit then a hack.




if you are concerned about "detection" from client-side hacks, dont be. The only way you will get caught hacking using a hacked client or proxy is if someone sees you doing something obvious (no-clipping, shooting through walls, ignoring debuffs like unstable, etc). If no one is around, use whatever client hacks you have available to you as you wont get caught.

The "server-side" hacks he's referring to is probably the "no server-side debuffs" hack, which ignores projectiles which have a debuff that you can't ignore client side (stunned is a "server-side" debuff because if you shoot while stunned you get disconnected).

The act of "ignoring" something sent by the server implies that its client-side, as its the client (or proxy FOR the client) that ignores it. Yes the debuff itself is server-side (cant be ignored), but you didnt remove the debuff/ignore the debuff (like with confuse/blind/drunk/etc) you just ignored the projectile that causes the debuff though a client-side hack. So its still all 100% client-side here.

Although if you were just pointing out that by "server-side" he meant the "no server-side debuffs"...then yeah thats what i assumed he was referring to as well. But just wanted to point out in my original post that its still client-side, and thus not detectable. Atleast until deca feels like handling collision on their end (which is they should do), at which point they would be able to tell if someone ignored a projectile. But that day will probably never come lol.

You are tricking the server when you block them. Either way, the buffs are handled on the server and thats why they are named that wag. This has been the case for literally years, how are you just now noticing?

Just now noticing what? Nothing i've said here was "just now noticed" by me. I knew what the guy was talking/asking about. I was simply stating that its not a "server-side hack", i would of said the same thing to anyone that posted asking about "server-side hacks" but you dont see people reference them as such very often (the specific hack is normally referred to as "no server-side debuffs", and isnt a "server-side hack" as i stated). So not sure what you missed in my posts to come to the conclusion i just now realized something

I was referring to people calling them no server-sided debuffs for years.
Are you really going all out on this because he called them server sided hacks instead of debuffs when it means literally the exact same thing?
What is the point lol

All out? My original post contained 3 sentence saying theres no such think as "server-side hacks" and the rest of the post was unrelated to that.

Then 059 replied to me in regards to it, so i followed that reply up with 2 sentences (although id probably say they are slight run-ons) expanding on why they are not "server-side hacks". The rest of the post just confirmed that i understood he probably meant "no server-side debuffs", as the post i was replying to pointed out.

Then you jumped in for some unknown reason to point out why they are called "no server-side debuffs", and so i replied again just confirming i understood that he probably meant "no server-side debuffs", and simply re-stating what i had originally said.