Combat Arms Visuals Test

I Tested The Three Different Preset Picture Quality Settings In CA, And Am Posting Them For Comparison.

Tell Me What You Think?
I Think Combat Arms Is Okay Quality, And The Settings Don't Really Change Anything About It. Unless You Change The Resolution, Everything Stays Relatively The Same.

Graphics Card: Nvideo GeForce 9400M
Resolution 1440x900
*IDK If That Matters, But I Figured Somebody Might Ask

High

Medium

Low

Yea i once changed the resoution and it was rally bad

Rofl in the 2nd picture some guys name is justinbeiber

but besides that it looks the same no matter what.
anti-alaising x8 lowered me from 40+ down to 17 FPS, and i saw no visual difference at all.

Wow really? thats awesome!

/sarcasm? .

Haha no i mean it :3

Use Bloom effect and you'll see an epic change in CA... =)

Originally Posted by pimpinallovertheworld666

Use Bloom effect and you'll see an epic change in CA... =)

lol the bloom effect made CA look like the player glow hack

Bloom effect gives me a headache, with all the lighting. Corn, turn anti-aliasing on to the max.

Bloom is fucked up, o-o

Bloom is awesome, but make's meh fraps lag.

it adds a gloomy fuzzy thing.
Fucks up snow valley for me.

Bloom Effect = Fail
-___-

I assume having graphical settings on low will decrease lag, I might have to try it after nexon fucked me up with a massive patch all those months ago

... Imma make a thread like this, but go more in depth with the settings.

Combat Arms Visuals Test

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread