Combat Arms Visuals Test

Posts 115 of 29 · Page 1 of 2
Combat Arms Visuals Test
I Tested The Three Different Preset Picture Quality Settings In CA, And Am Posting Them For Comparison.

Tell Me What You Think?
I Think Combat Arms Is Okay Quality, And The Settings Don't Really Change Anything About It. Unless You Change The Resolution, Everything Stays Relatively The Same.

Graphics Card: Nvideo GeForce 9400M
Resolution 1440x900
*IDK If That Matters, But I Figured Somebody Might Ask



High


Medium


Low

Yea i once changed the resoution and it was rally bad


Rofl in the 2nd picture some guys name is justinbeiber
but besides that it looks the same no matter what.
anti-alaising x8 lowered me from 40+ down to 17 FPS, and i saw no visual difference at all.
Wow really? thats awesome!
/sarcasm? .
Haha no i mean it :3
Quote Originally Posted by pimpinallovertheworld666 View Post
Use Bloom effect and you'll see an epic change in CA... =)
lol the bloom effect made CA look like the player glow hack
Bloom effect gives me a headache, with all the lighting. Corn, turn anti-aliasing on to the max.
Bloom is fucked up, o-o
Bloom is awesome, but make's meh fraps lag.
it adds a gloomy fuzzy thing.
Fucks up snow valley for me.
Bloom Effect = Fail
-___-
I assume having graphical settings on low will decrease lag, I might have to try it after nexon fucked me up with a massive patch all those months ago
... Imma make a thread like this, but go more in depth with the settings.
Posts 115 of 29 · Page 1 of 2
This thread is closed for replies.

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread

None

Need help?