Who do you want for president?

I'd do Al Gore as #1, but I'll vote for Obama since Gore hasn't decided to run *yet*. =)

Well, if you didn't watch Fox News, you would know that Pakistan has the most terrorists. It doesn't matter that there are MORE Muslims. He isn't a dumbass that would waste our tax dollars on invading a country, overthrowing the government, making false claims (WMDs, Oil will pay for war), and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians... He wants to have troops between the Pakistan-Afghanistan border which is highly mountainous, and save haven for terrorists. Bush isn't even attacking the problem, and he's too much of a pussy to admit it. Much like how Dickie said invading Iraq was dumb when he was VP, but now he says it's OK. You don't need experience to run a country, you need knowledge. I'd bet anything that Obama could run the country better than Bush. Obama has made the smartest comments I have seen from any presidential candidate.

"They're neither our enemy nor our friend. They're competitors." - about China

He wants the public to be able to vote on legislation. He has nukes off the tables in War of Terror.

He's a smart man, and it burns you up inside to know that he probably has the best chance of becoming president.

Are you FUCKING serious? Wow, you are such a dumbass, I haven't banned you for anything except flaming other religions and going off topic you dipshit.

Lets take a look at who stopped rebuttling who...
http://www.mpgh.net/forum/islam_vs_w..._of_islam.html
http://www.mpgh.net/forum/united_sta...bastard-3.html

Of course your just a bitch that is all talk and can't back up anything you say because you pull everything out of your ass. "Burden of proof" my ass...

Your idiocy shows. Obama isn't planning to invade Pakistan you moron, he's sending troops to the MOUNTAINS of Pakistan to clear out the terrorists. He's not going to overthrow the Pakistani government, he's going to clear out the terrorists, with or without the support of Musharraf. Like I said already, Pakistan's government is already unstable, and Musharraf is loosing power and an election is inevitable, if a radical government comes in power, the US/Isreal/India will be invading to remove the nukes out of the hands of potential terrorists. In the event that would happen, Obama would look smart to invade Pakistan and remove the terrorists, and end another side to the DD equation. Worst case scenario, Pakistan attacks any country with nukes, the effect would be limited because

A) we already know where their nukes are
B) they aren't Hydrogen Bombs
C) they have less than 50 nuclear missiles.

"Also the US is only responsible for 11% of the deaths, the rest are mostly from car bombs and death squads." Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, that's the funniest shit I have ever heard in my life, care to provide any facts, oh wait, Neo-Cons just pull shit out of their asses... Of course.

Zarqawi didn't flee to Iraq you dumbass, he fled to Afghanistan where the Taliban was to get support, then he went to Iraq where Al-Qaeda hides to fight the Shia government. Oh right, and Saddam has a record for killing terrorists, so yeah your bullshit works out great doesn't it? Hey Zarqawi, come to Iraq and fight our government, and attack our people, we love you just that much... Bring up a dead guy to make yourself love you soooo much? Your idiot responses shows your inexperience in these topics, so why don't you shut the fuck up. You say the most dumbest things, seriously, the most basic fact that a Shia government wants Zarqawi to attack them, so they invite them in right?

Obama uses notecards in debates... Ok?

Duncan Hunter can't even get a presidential candidate nomination. Yeah, good job. Welcome Mister President.