Rep Dispute
Post/Thread Reputation was received on: https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthrea...#post149104714
Date: 8/23/2020
Reason for dispute: Not understanding the reasoning behind the de-rep, never quoted her or said anything to her. I quoted a user and answered his question as others weren't and he realized it.
"Fuck are ya doing encouraging scams?" was the de-rep message
The only context I can give is we were talking about charging back on the company for the section (RotMG) and what the length of time you have to be able to do such thing. This was not in regarding to scamming users on MPGH nor did the OP have that intent and that was made clear. I think the whole de-rep was necessary because if you honestly disagreed with something I, or others, said in that thread she has the power to remove, infract and even ban those users. De-repping does nothing but create unneeded drama and this whole situation was handled incorrectly, coming from an ex-staff of that section.
User who gave Reputation: Kate
Date: 8/23/2020
Reason for dispute: Not understanding the reasoning behind the de-rep, never quoted her or said anything to her. I quoted a user and answered his question as others weren't and he realized it.
"Fuck are ya doing encouraging scams?" was the de-rep message
The only context I can give is we were talking about charging back on the company for the section (RotMG) and what the length of time you have to be able to do such thing. This was not in regarding to scamming users on MPGH nor did the OP have that intent and that was made clear. I think the whole de-rep was necessary because if you honestly disagreed with something I, or others, said in that thread she has the power to remove, infract and even ban those users. De-repping does nothing but create unneeded drama and this whole situation was handled incorrectly, coming from an ex-staff of that section.
User who gave Reputation: Kate
