Classing Masterclass [Class Two]
Classing Masterclass [Class Two]
Class away /
Ya, I don't really care, I'mma just post my rankings.
1. semi-pro
Sky could use some work, but overall nice shading, originality, depth, and not too cluttered.
2. Solid Novice
Colors don't match, focal doesn't blend and the overall picture makes my eyes hurt. No flow either.
3. High Moderate
The negative space doesn't affect this piece at all, it makes it look better. The lighting is sweet, the colors are great, and the focal is clear. The only problem is that it's a tad too little. If a tiny bit, just a tiny bit more was added it would be better.
4. Low Intermediate
Very nice photomanip, just great. It's nearly perfect, or completely perfect. Could work a bit on the background, not just plain black.
5. High Intermediate
Not much to say here but perfection. I wanted to rank higher, but that's as far as I could go. The side of the face that we could see, if some parts were colored there, I might have ranked higher.
GOGOGO YOU AUSTRALIANS!!!
1. semi-pro
Sky could use some work, but overall nice shading, originality, depth, and not too cluttered.
2. Solid Novice
Colors don't match, focal doesn't blend and the overall picture makes my eyes hurt. No flow either.
3. High Moderate
The negative space doesn't affect this piece at all, it makes it look better. The lighting is sweet, the colors are great, and the focal is clear. The only problem is that it's a tad too little. If a tiny bit, just a tiny bit more was added it would be better.
4. Low Intermediate
Very nice photomanip, just great. It's nearly perfect, or completely perfect. Could work a bit on the background, not just plain black.
5. High Intermediate
Not much to say here but perfection. I wanted to rank higher, but that's as far as I could go. The side of the face that we could see, if some parts were colored there, I might have ranked higher.
GOGOGO YOU AUSTRALIANS!!!
Lol your lazy. I know the thread you got 2 or 3 of them from. :P
I know where you got yours from too, and I know the artist personally ;D
Originally Posted by kikikannibal
I know where you got yours from too, and I know the artist personally ;D
And for the most part I actually agree with Dragon. Except for the second. I think low mod suits it, for me at least. I quite like that style
But the focal could use some work. Originally Posted by Doc
Truche
And for the most part I actually agree with Dragon. Except for the second. I think low mod suits it, for me at least. I quite like that style
But the focal could use some work.Too many of the basic fundamentals of what makes a nice piece are off in that second one.
It lacks depth, the composition is..well what composition?
The lighting is off, because there are just way too many random sources.
The biggest thing that throws me is the compo.
I think if it was a little less chaotic I would go more with your point and say low mod.
High inter/ Low semi
Solid Nov
High Nov
High Mod
Solid Inter
Solid Nov
High Nov
High Mod
Solid Inter
Yah I understand where you coming from. I just always liked that style. It probs is novice but im being biased on that one :P
i get wat ur saying doc
I completely disagree with the inters on the last one. It has great composition and balance of elements. The use of negative space is very well used and the colours and very appealing to look at. Low Pro at least on that one.
Im on the fence about that one. I don't know if it's worth pro, but it's definitely appealing enough.
Sold semi, Low mod, Solid mod, High mod, Inter
Justtttttttt in my opinion
Justtttttttt in my opinion
We should find some real pro tags. Not just crops.
I can show you pro tags if you want
Post a couple, not too many. I don't want you copy pasting the inspiration thread from PR 
I wanna see my section critique them.
I wanna see my section critique them.
This thread is closed for replies.
