[Review] Hack Toolkit + revival

Good day fellas,
I was not sure where to put this in the CA section, so I put it where it normally goes in the CAEU section. I released a tool 2 days ago in CAEU.
And I realized its a universal tool so I figured I'd post the updated version here as well

Note I've removed the auto hack generating option, because with the revival option this gets a little useless, do you guys want it there? I can still put it back

It's finally done, the revival function is. finally. done!

Say you have an awesome cool menu hack that used to work like 2 months ago. You have tried and tried making the hack undetected through various hex editors and other tools. But you've got to admit defeat, it isn't going to work this way.

If you ever found yourself in this situation I've got the perfect way out for you. The hack reviver. The only things you have to do is assemble two files containing the addresses that need to be replaced, and the addresses they need to be replaced with. (Old.txt and Make.txt)

It looks like this:
Note: The addresses must be supplied inside Old & Make.txt

After that you open the tool, and supply it with the data it asks for:

Training is a dll file with the addresses seen in Old.txt

Press enter and let the tool do it's job.
Now the final test:

If this screen-shot wasn't proof enough for you, wait until I release it. I will release it today or tomorrow.

Note I've removed the auto hack generating option, because with the revival option this gets a little useless, do you guys want it there? I can still put it back

The undetector is still inside the toolkit.

-SCHiM
Happy hacking

Cool Idea but if the hack is detected or patched, CA will close when you try to run it.

Originally Posted by Shakugan no Shana

Cool Idea but if the hack is detected or patched, CA will close when you try to run it.

No I've an garbage/code generator, no md5 or fuzzy hash will be the same

Admirable idea, but almost anyone who can get both sets of address themselves could just make/update their own hack.

But that still takes more time than updating it this way. And what about those who cannot create their own hacks and just want a quick & simple solution?

Originally Posted by .::SCHiM::.

No I've an garbage/code generator, no md5 or fuzzy hash will be the same

But that still takes more time than updating it this way. And what about those who cannot create their own hacks and just want a quick & simple solution?

Then chances are they don't have the addresses or know what they need specifically.

Originally Posted by Disturbed

Then chances are they don't have the addresses or know what they need specifically.

Those addresses can be found in threads, I know for sure that 90% of the programmers use the addresses posted here, and I can start an Internet service where the correct addresses are posted which the program can automatically pickup. And once the correct old addresses are found, they'll never change. so the only thing that'll need updating will be the new addresses

this doesn't really makes any sense.. i say your a choob D:

Maybe you haven't understood what the tool does...

Great

Ty