
Originally Posted by
Liz
Thought of this last night right around the time i was falling asleep.
If all major religions agree that God gave the 10 commandments, one of which is 'Thou shalt not kill"
So how do religious fanatics or religious people in general (not just radical Islamics, but Christians, Jews etc) justify the mass killing of people under the banner of "God".
I know that some people are bound to say, well the commandment in hebrew (לא תרצח) Can also be translated into "Thou shalt not MURDER" but then the same question applies, isn't killing innocent civilians murder? and if so, should those people not be condemned, not revered as martyrs etc?
Just wondering....
All in all i consider all religious conflict basically a fight for who has the best imaginary friend. But personal views aside, and following dogmatic logic, i came about this thought.
I agree i with u.
Jihad is tooken as an advantage by terrorists as a way to gain control.
Same thing is done by the crusade. and the Zionist.
All is for control.
BUT, the meaning of Jihad isn't fight in the name of God. but its depth is a paradox.
-Fight only when attacked
Not just stand there and get killed.
BUT. Jihad is for when the RELIGIoN it self is under threat, not a group i.e a country.
Iran = Get attacked by America, Many shiekhs called Jihad. and the Muslim world laughed at the call. but still helped.
The word Jihad is one of the most powerful words in the world.
--
Crusade just wanted jerusalem, not because its were jesus [christian believe got killed]
But because they felt threatened by Muslims and Jews in the holy land then killed them. then war started.
Christians vs Muslim, which was a Jihad. a holy war.
--
Zionism isn't orthodox jews. orthodox believe you can convert to judaism, zionist believe your born jewish. and none jews are "demons".
orthodox can be the nicest people :]