[Release] MPGH Login API.

Posts 1–15 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

Release By Official MPGH Program Development & Design Team
Coded by Jason

Hey, just a quick release for you guys.

Basically, I made a class library for MPGH login authentication for your applications. You can use it to verify that people have a legit MPGH account before using your program, it's super easy to use.

1. Download the zip in the attachments below.
2. Extract the contained .dll to anywhere on your computer.
3. Create your VB Project
4. Go to "Project->Add Reference" then go to the browse tab and locate the .dll you extracted.
5. Create an instance of the MPGHLogin.LoginAPI like so:

Code:

Dim LoginObj As New MPGHLogin.LoginAPI

6. Call the "TryLogin" function whenever you need it like so:

Code:

If LoginObj.TryLogin("MPGHusernamehere", "MPGHpasswordhere") Then
   MsgBox("Login success!")
Else
   MsgBox("Login fail!")
End If

7. ?????
8. Profit.

Well, that's about all you need to know, I can't really get any SS seeing as it's a class library, but here's the scans:

VirusTotal - Free Online Virus, Malware and URL Scanner

http://virscan.org/report/721d662a07...82b4a7266.html.

The .dll is obfuscated as NextGen advised me that making the source public could be some sort of security issue. If a mod doesn't trust me, I'll be happy to send you an unobfuscated version which you can read through and then obfuscate and re-upload.

Anyway, hope someone gets some use out of this.

Cheers,
Jason

Looks great

Might use in future projects.

Looks good, but the problem is that most users won't give their passwords in our apps. I am developing Video Phoenix just for MPGH and I am using a method that will verify that you are an MPGH user. What it does is, it parses all the thanks to OP. The user will login with his name. Database will store his processor and motherboard's ID and see if his name is present on the thanks list. Once a user logs in, no other user would be able to use same name. The only drawback of this method is that you'll have to quickly login after giving thanks, since the processor and motherboard ID will be stored of the first logged in PC. I am using this method and it works great. You don't have to ask for password.

Originally Posted by Hassan

Hmmm, so if I then try to login on my other computer...it'll buttrape itself? Also sounds like an elaborate thanks ruse!

Originally Posted by Jason

Hmmm, so if I then try to login on my other computer...it'll buttrape itself? Also sounds like an elaborate thanks ruse!

Haha, you know I don't beg for thanks, its just a way of confirming :P

Also, NG told me that Dave doesn't allow any release that asks for MPGH's password.

Originally Posted by Hassan

Haha, you know I don't beg for thanks, its just a way of confirming :P

But does this mean you're restricted to one computer for your account?

What if someone uses your program without knowing the ramifications at a friends house? The application is now barred to him whenever he's at home.

@Second part, FUUU!!! Ah well, if it's not destined to be approved, then it's not destined to be approved. I'd already written the function (but it was a sub originally) for a program I needed to log into my own account for, so it wasn't like this took me hours and losing it will make me QQ.

Originally Posted by Jason

Well, we can always give give them some type of key that they can use only in very specific conditions. I will make this system better by the end of V.P.

Also, don't get mad at not being approved. I quitted MPGH desktop app when NG told this to me. He said Dave will not allow this. And this makes sense too. Not all mods decompile the source code, mostly in hacking sections...So there, it can be used for any negative purposes.

This will be epic :P
EDIT: Dave made a good point. It will be way to easy to turn this into an MPGH account stealer.

Originally Posted by JamesA1994

This will be epic :P
EDIT: Dave made a good point. It will be way to easy to turn this into an MPGH account stealer.

Dave ?

Well, if someone did make an account stealer then it wouldn't be approved, as the mods decompile and view the source of all applications before approving. And anyone that puts a "Login" dialog in their project could be potentially jacking accounts, I wouldn't say this makes it any easier.

Originally Posted by Jason

Dave... Mr HA.

Find me one hack on MPGH that has a login form.
If this gets released there could be many... Meaning anyone could create a stealer.
And yeah, we do decompile, but its easily possible to miss something especially if its packed.

Originally Posted by JamesA1994

When did Dave comment?

If it's packed, you're not supposed to approve it in the first place without first viewing the unpacked version, so it's on you in the event that a keylogger slips through.

Anyone can create a stealer anyway /facepalm. 2 textboxes and a button. Put your MPGH details here. Baibai account. This has no inherent features which would assist an account stealer lol.

Originally Posted by Jason

Over msn.
But by releasing this there could be more login forms on MPGH. I am just saying it could increase the loggers.

Originally Posted by JamesA1994

Over msn.
But by releasing this there could be more login forms on MPGH. I am just saying it could increase the loggers.

I still maintain that this would have nothing to do with keyloggers, why would people even bother referencing this just to make a keylogger? If someone's determined to steal accounts, they will do it anyway. How will this act as a catalyst for more keyloggers honestly

This doesn't use a WebBrowser, does it?

Originally Posted by JamesA1994

And this is related to an account stealing releases because ... ?

With the release of new OSes and software, there will be new bugs and exploits. And this means that we don't release new software altogether, which would stop these bugs and exploits from being present, yes?

Originally Posted by freedompeace

This doesn't use a WebBrowser, does it?

And this is related to an account stealing releases because ... ?

With the release of new OSes and software, there will be new bugs and exploits. And this means that we don't release new software altogether, which would stop these bugs and exploits from being present, yes?

No, no webbrowser

Posts 1–15 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

123

This thread is closed for replies.

Tags for this Thread

None