LOL funny shit XD
Crashing. HELP PLEASE!
@ac1d_buRn
k instead of looking for "working" detours lets work out what exactly is detected.. When you added your Detour code in your empty Dll did you call the detour or was the code just sitting there not being used? Reason I ask this will determine how it got detected, which if it was the code just sitting without being called we can assume the detour function has a signature to it and is very easy to make undetected again.
k instead of looking for "working" detours lets work out what exactly is detected.. When you added your Detour code in your empty Dll did you call the detour or was the code just sitting there not being used? Reason I ask this will determine how it got detected, which if it was the code just sitting without being called we can assume the detour function has a signature to it and is very easy to make undetected again.
Originally Posted by PashaAmd
LOL funny shit XD
Originally Posted by Departure
@ac1d_buRn
k instead of looking for "working" detours lets work out what exactly is detected.. When you added your Detour code in your empty Dll did you call the detour or was the code just sitting there not being used? Reason I ask this will determine how it got detected, which if it was the code just sitting without being called we can assume the detour function has a signature to it and is very easy to make undetected again.
k instead of looking for "working" detours lets work out what exactly is detected.. When you added your Detour code in your empty Dll did you call the detour or was the code just sitting there not being used? Reason I ask this will determine how it got detected, which if it was the code just sitting without being called we can assume the detour function has a signature to it and is very easy to make undetected again.
Originally Posted by Departure
@ac1d_buRn
k instead of looking for "working" detours lets work out what exactly is detected.. When you added your Detour code in your empty Dll did you call the detour or was the code just sitting there not being used? Reason I ask this will determine how it got detected, which if it was the code just sitting without being called we can assume the detour function has a signature to it and is very easy to make undetected again.
k instead of looking for "working" detours lets work out what exactly is detected.. When you added your Detour code in your empty Dll did you call the detour or was the code just sitting there not being used? Reason I ask this will determine how it got detected, which if it was the code just sitting without being called we can assume the detour function has a signature to it and is very easy to make undetected again.
Originally Posted by ac1d_buRn
I called the detour.
I find it amusing );
try and NOT call the detour and see if you disconnected but still have the detour in your dll
Originally Posted by whit
I gotta feeling Where bout to get some good info
Originally Posted by Departure
try and NOT call the detour and see if you disconnected but still have the detour in your dll
will start adding stuff to it and see what happens.
Thanks for all your help !
EDIT: It fixed just like that? well nvm... any particular reason?
Originally Posted by why06
EDIT: It fixed just like that? well nvm... any particular reason?
Originally Posted by whit
I Told him to change the Detour Length
Originally Posted by why06
Okay. that was easy.
Quote: "I Told him to change the Detour Length"
While im not sure what you meant about "Change Length" I will assume it was a byte signature detection, I am glad its fixed now without having to changing the detours functionality.
While im not sure what you meant about "Change Length" I will assume it was a byte signature detection, I am glad its fixed now without having to changing the detours functionality.
Originally Posted by Departure
Quote: "I Told him to change the Detour Length"
While im not sure what you meant about "Change Length" I will assume it was a byte signature detection, I am glad its fixed now without having to changing the detours functionality.
While im not sure what you meant about "Change Length" I will assume it was a byte signature detection, I am glad its fixed now without having to changing the detours functionality.
