Has me thinking...

In a nutshell, the overall question of this is "Why do girls HAVE to wear shirts everywhere or at least something to cover their breasts"

To get down to the matter, men don't wear shirts everywhere. Girls do. It's globally known that women cover their breasts. But why? Think back in the primeval days, BC days, etc. Men wore no upper body clothing unless it was winter. Neither did women. What changed to the point where it became so wrong for a woman to be shirtless? Back then it was ok. Why did it change over time? We still use basic morals and knowledge. We don't keep the everyone can be shirtless custom though. This is less on the "tits" matter, more on the why. It couldn't be because they get big and they want to cover them. I've seen fat ass niggas with tits bigger than my fist and they don't give a fuck. I mean, yeah, it's nasty. Why aren't they wearing a bra? Why is it immoral for any woman, flat or well-endowed, to be topless? By flat I mean piece of cardboard with a bikini top on it. Flat. They still wear shirts and bikini tops. It can't be the whole "having or not having breasts" thing, as we can see.

My overall question is: What changed from shirtless is accepted to shirtless is forbidden?

Not to sound pervy, in any way. This has nothing to do with breasts, more to do with the immense change over time.

It's now considered part of the sexual reproduction system, only reason why they began covering them.

Also humans believe what ever the other gender doesn't have should be hidden.

this is the thoughts that a 12 yr old would think, just wants to see boobs in person

Originally Posted by Hyak

this is the thoughts that a 12 yr old would think, just wants to see boobs in person

Like I said, this is focused more on the reasons why it happened, not the outcome.

Don't worry there's still national no pants day, least you get to see some cheeks

Originally Posted by Lyle

It's now considered part of the sexual reproduction system, only reason why they began covering them.

Also humans believe what ever the other gender doesn't have should be hidden.

I don't believe that. We already know it's there, so what's the point. The whole reproductive system thing could be it.

My theory is jealousy. Women get jealous of the women with larger breasts and decide to cover there's for the hopes of the male not knowing what's under the clothes. Eventually, the bigger tits get jealous of the little tits and it all becomes popular. Hence where stuffing their bra came from.

Originally Posted by Lyle

Don't worry there's still national no pants day, least you get to see some cheeks

Boobs are never the big deal for me. They're not part of sex. I'm not gonna be fucking your tits. That shit is weird as fuck to me. I mean, it's definitely a bonus, but ass is where it's at. Can't be getting bruises from a boney ass.

I think is has something to do with religion...

Everything in women is so mutafacka seductive and from hell from their point of view ¬¬

Originally Posted by Ad litteram

I think is has something to do with religion...

Everything in women is so mutafacka seductive and from hell from their point of view ¬¬

Depends on how she looks

the girls just want to make you curious

Originally Posted by lolbie

the girls just want to make you curious

As I said in my second, non original post, post. Human nature.

because some chick's tits can be really distracting.

Originally Posted by Da Kurlzz

because some chick's tits can be really distracting.

Back then, they were just the norm. Had the customs stayed and we still had this mindset, yeah, that'd be true. But there are some old ladies and flatties .

Cause if they didn't, uncle Jimmy would be handing out glasses of fresh rape to all the ladies..
Jimmy's rape is scary. It's on a whole other level that not even Wildbill can get on.
That niggas rape is like HBO soft porn.

Originally Posted by J Miliam

Depends on how she looks

It is not about how she looks like...
it is just about her gender.

You should take a look at this

It is a picture I found in an article...
the article is in spanish, but Im to lazy to translate it by myself so I used googles translator (it sox, I know XD)

"The ultra-Orthodox newspaper "Der Tzitung" published by the Hasidic Jewish community in New York, decided to remove the image from the Secretary of State, United States, Hillary Clinton, and another official of the now famous photo where it appears the president and Barack Obama safety equipment following the details of the operation Geronimo allowed to kill the leader of Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden.

The newspaper decided to remove the silhouette of two women on the grounds that it is "too outrageous" and even though the White House explicitly forbade the handling of photography has been one of the most published and views in the world since it was released after the death of terrorist leader.

It should be remembered that it is editorial policy of "Der Tzitung" not to publish images of women as "sexually suggestive."

In the picture, Clinton appears dressed in a suit and shirt collar closed, covering her mouth in a gesture of tension. Next to it are also President and Vice President Obama, Joe Biden, as well as members of the national security team.

While other image corresponds to Audrey Tomason deleted, terrorism director of Obama's team, who sticks his head outside the door, the back of the room where they met other U.S. officials.

Taken from the web portals: ABC and The New York Jewish Week"

Originally Posted by J Miliam

Back then, they were just the norm. Had the customs stayed and we still had this mindset, yeah, that'd be true. But there are some old ladies and flatties .

yea, i got your point.

maybe cause bras were invented in the first place to help support boobs? then gradually over the time people feel that all women need to wear one? and hence become immoral not to?

Has me thinking...

Post a Reply

Tags for this Thread