I used someones source and I made a crypter, and I'm debating on whether or not I should release it...It wont be FUD, but it works.
I gave proper credits and everything, just debating if I should release it. Maybe add a login like usual, but set it to where only specific users can use it
Give opinions
'wont be fud'
donotwant.
Originally Posted by Cal
'wont be fud'
donotwant.
Well what do you expect from a source that's been sitting out there for 8 months? I know it works, and just looking for opinions. Or I just thought of doing like a multi tool or something with a crypter, a UDP Flooder, and a MSN freezer
both shitty source's found on the internet, re-fud and release to 1K+ members or 2.5K members in elite section
nah i was torlling it would be pretty good release.
Originally Posted by Cal
both shitty source's found on the internet, re-fud and release to 1K+ members or 2.5K members in elite section
nah i was torlling it would be pretty good release.
Aight so which do you think I should do?...Combine them all in one or what?
Originally Posted by FUKO
Aight so which do you think I should do?...Combine them all in one or what?
@FUKO just combine them all its better then not doing it. And yeah make a login so only people you want have the password. /me ?
Originally Posted by Wintersun12345
@FUKO just combine them all its better then not doing it. And yeah make a login so only people you want have the password. /me ?
.
A crypter for what?
@FUKO Really crypting something and having it not be fud is really kinda pointless in my opinion. IDK that's just me though
Originally Posted by Locke
A crypter for what?
Explain what the fuck you're doing here please.
Originally Posted by Fogest
@FUKO Really crypting something and having it not be fud is really kinda pointless in my opinion. IDK that's just me though
Thanks for the honest opinion...I tested it out, and it brought a 93% down to a 30%