Obviously you can add a debit card to your PayPal, go to "Add/Edit Card"
First of all, theres a thing called the "edit" button, you that instead of double posting, and second, theres a patch, and theres not hacks working atm. Not even VIp, so just wait.. Patience is of the essence
sorry next time ill do it
Originally Posted by Zhellbound
Patience is of the essence
Patience is a virtue
Time is of the essence
People can post mutli-hacks.. Just most won't obviously or not the good stuff anyways.. Why make something public when you can keep it private to keep it from being patched so easily, or when you can sell it.. There is the strife camo hack that works half-assed for some people after the patch.. Theres plenty of tuts on the first page.. Others have already answered your question regarding paypal.
I find it hilarious that people will pay money for a hack developed for a game that's free. What the fuck kind of logic is employed in this process?
refer to the list of what can be posted and what cant.
MPGH VIP IS THE BEST
Originally Posted by kambo
MPGH VIP IS THE BEST
Thanks for the spam,
and I couldn't agree more with the guy asking why pay for hacks for a free game. By the looks of it, some people are willing to fork over the 20 bucks a month for them. Personally, CA isn't all that exciting enough to want to pay for. Honestly, going online and shooting other online players gets old.
The last multi hack that was released was Harold's Elitevision (i think). By the way, Harold told me that he doesn't even play CA. I don't think too many people would hack a game to please a gaming world, if they don't play the game themselves.
Also, you stated that a mod made this statement. SO could you reveal some sources for us?? Seriously, if it's against the rules, then why has it occured and the names of the creators (Harold and Longevity) become very well known and respected?? For Christ's sake, Harold is in the popular tag list...
Originally Posted by shazbork
I find it hilarious that people will pay money for a hack developed for a game that's free. What the fuck kind of logic is employed in this process?
1) The game is free so its not taking any money anyways.
2) There rich and dont care spending money on a game.
3) What I dont see logical is paying for a hack when you just spend $60 on the game.
Originally Posted by woody77
1) The game is free so its not taking any money anyways.
2) There rich and dont care spending money on a game.
3) What I dont see logical is paying for a hack when you just spend $60 on the game.
True, why pay for a hack, when you could buy a new game for 20 bucks. Seriously, there are other FPS shooters that have free online play, and are probaly more interesting than CA has become.