Sum Typography

Hmm, i made some text. That includes the one in my sig.
[IMG]http://i381.photobucke*****m/albums/oo259/darkstar9540/wildbilltype.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i381.photobucke*****m/albums/oo259/darkstar9540/wildbillburntwood.png[/IMG]

I just finally finished DLing CS5 extended full, i was using lite portable PS and illy. Going to mess around with all the effects for while.

The first one is cool but simple and not very appealing. I just like what you did with the letters. Second one looks like a tut.

Originally Posted by Ryguy

The first one is cool but simple and not very appealing. I just like what you did with the letters. Second one looks like a tut.

I don't use tuts

Second one I just went for a firey-wood look with the wood gradient in gimp.
And it's low-quality

reminds me why i got CS5 extended

First one is better than the second one mainly because of the curves and its more creative than the second one.

This is text...typography is something entirely different.
But alright nonetheless.

Originally Posted by Wild Bill HickCock

Hmm, i made some text. That includes the one in my sig.
[IMG]http://i381.photobucke*****m/albums/oo259/darkstar9540/wildbilltype.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i381.photobucke*****m/albums/oo259/darkstar9540/wildbillburntwood.png[/IMG]

I just finally finished DLing CS5 extended full, i was using lite portable PS and illy. Going to mess around with all the effects for while.

Woot all sexy fonts!
I like the color scheme in the second text, but the font of the first one is waaaay better! IMO

they are both very simple and not very appealing. work on your size and technique

Originally Posted by Storm

they are both very simple and not very appealing. work on your size and technique

Lulz work on your CnC skills

maybe i just couldn't be bothered giving a proper detailed cnc for something so simple and unattractive.

Sum Typography

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread