You guys are all hatersss!
Congrats too..
Originally Posted by udp
You guys are all hatersss!
Originally Posted by Mouzie
It doesn't really matter, it MADE him go there and read it. So he got thoughts about it, maybe a troll or not. I just want Dave to understand the favorism problem we have here. If he wasn't so busy I would love to talk to him on MSN about it.
Originally Posted by udp
You guys are all hatersss!
On who? Jeff?
Originally Posted by Mouzie
It doesn't really matter, it MADE him go there and read it. So he got thoughts about it, maybe a troll or not. I just want Dave to understand the favorism problem we have here. If he wasn't so busy I would love to talk to him on MSN about it.
dave's never busyI'm not a coder 
Originally Posted by AVGN
I'm not a coder
Originally Posted by AVGN
I'm not a coder
Originally Posted by AVGN
I'm not a coder
1. A coder will get the tag of contributor. Yet, someone who is just as active and helps around doesn't.
2. A coder who releases stuff might get more awards and even a 'boost in positions'.
3. A person who releases things and does things to make the community more productive doesn't get a merit or anything.
4. A person who did bad a job before, is still elected again.
5. People who is fully qualified isn't given chance or even thought of positions.
Originally Posted by Mouzie
It isn't that. I was not a coder, but yet I was told from a lot of Minions, mods, etc. That I wasn't allowed.
1. A coder will get the tag of contributor. Yet, someone who is just as active and helps around doesn't.
2. A coder who releases stuff might get more awards and even a 'boost in positions'.
3. A person who releases things and does things to make the community more productive doesn't get a merit or anything.
4. A person who did bad a job before, is still elected again.
5. People who is fully qualified isn't given chance or even thought of positions.
1. A coder will get the tag of contributor. Yet, someone who is just as active and helps around doesn't.
2. A coder who releases stuff might get more awards and even a 'boost in positions'.
3. A person who releases things and does things to make the community more productive doesn't get a merit or anything.
4. A person who did bad a job before, is still elected again.
5. People who is fully qualified isn't given chance or even thought of positions.
Originally Posted by Alessandro10
First MPGH Contributor /me
I thought there were a few before you
Agree with this ^ 100%.
Seems like things are being more biast towards coders now a days..
.
Not everyone has the talent/ability to do what they can
Seems like things are being more biast towards coders now a days..
.Not everyone has the talent/ability to do what they can
LOL mouzie
In previous minion apps you had serios competition.
In this one there were some pretty slim pickins.
IF you would've applied I might have pulled for you.
In previous minion apps you had serios competition.
In this one there were some pretty slim pickins.
IF you would've applied I might have pulled for you.
Originally Posted by AVGN
LOL mouzie
In previous minion apps you had serios competition.
In this one there were some pretty slim pickins.
IF you would've applied I might have pulled for you.
In previous minion apps you had serios competition.
In this one there were some pretty slim pickins.
IF you would've applied I might have pulled for you.
(No offence to you personally)
Originally Posted by AVGN
LOL mouzie
In previous minion apps you had serios competition.
In this one there were some pretty slim pickins.
IF you would've applied I might have pulled for you.
In previous minion apps you had serios competition.
In this one there were some pretty slim pickins.
IF you would've applied I might have pulled for you.
And I propose a simple and fair solution to the problems.
1. You have an election, to be fair, there should be two Minions. One for the hack section (which clearly would get the most votes) and the non-coder. This balances between coders getting the 'crowd' votes because they make hacks. This election is everyone can join and after a few days. The top five people is selected for another election. There is no asking for votes via VMs or PMs to prevent unfairness.
2. The second election will be voted by the CA community. However, the final votes will not count. Instead the two people that is elected the most will be reviewed and chosen, if one or both is denied. Then the next three is picked and two people are picked. This allowed both the community AND the staff to figure out a common ground.
Originally Posted by Shakugan no Shana
Glad to hear my application was taken seriously being a veteran and contributor to the CA section.
(No offence to you personally)
