Less Recoil Source Code

Posts 16–26 of 26 · Page 2 of 2
Quote Originally Posted by uarethebest View Post
LOL what is C+P??
Copy and pasted
He mean , the ghost say to change for this (int y = 0; y <9; y++) , Maybe its C+P because why don't change for
(int j = 0; j <9; j++)
Yup i thin it's C+P
Quote Originally Posted by Ryuesi View Post
Yup i thin it's C+P
Lol why did u judge so Fast ..Maybe he is a leecher...
Wrong , You can Use 2\3 Offset's For Less Recoil Easier More than This
Quote Originally Posted by BlackLite View Post
Wrong , You can Use 2\3 Offset's For Less Recoil Easier More than This
only 0x1930
Quote Originally Posted by Code[VB] View Post
i looked 2 seconds over this code.. i read only this code part > and its extremely false!

Code:
2C+j*4) = 0.0f;
fail code! fail thopic! sory.. but lol

edit// becouse the offs is not 4*loop :P .. just and only fail coders here!
edit 2 // only the wep pointer is 4*loop
A float is also 4 bytes... so...
@giniyat101
Correct , there many ways to make Recoil

i can make Less recoil with 1 offset and Perfect with 4 Offsets ^^ , others can make with 7 others 5 others 13 ^^.

Maybe its solved ?
Quote Originally Posted by LoveyMush View Post
@giniyat101
Correct , there many ways to make Recoil

i can make Less recoil with 1 offset and Perfect with 4 Offsets ^^ , others can make with 7 others 5 others 13 ^^.

Maybe its solved ?
you are right but you will have another loop ---> means more than 4 offsets if you dont use a loop
And less recoil sucks anyways. I know you are learning and good job, but seriously the less recoil is more annoying than helpful. Atleast in my experience.
Posts 16–26 of 26 · Page 2 of 2

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread

None

Talk with us