Banned?

Ok Hero

Infracting because of "your interpretation of a request close"
- Within your rights

Moving my thread to staff Disputes
- I posted in wrong section

Discussing my Ban with me
- Very nice of you, (considering I DID NOT @ MENTION YOU IN MY THREAD)
If you didn't catch that it means that you voluntarily helped me by explaining my Infraction
and had NO obligation to READ and/ or RESPOND to any of my posts (Thank you)

Banning me for a pointless dispute with staff member
- WHAT? Why did you move my thread to staff DISPUTES if you didn't want to discuss my infraction?
As far as the pointless dispute aspect goes, really...??? IF you did not believe that I had broken a rule then you wouldn't have infracted me
SO = wouldn't this entire forum be "pointless disputes"

Don't "optionally" dispute if your just going to ban them for "peacefully" responding with you

P.S. " " is for emphasis not sarcasm
Definition of emphasis in case you didn't know
m·pha·sis
noun /ˈemfəsis/
emphases, plural

Special importance, value, or prominence given to something
- they placed great emphasis on the individual's freedom
- different emphases and viewpoints

Stress laid on a word or words to indicate special meaning or particular importance

Vigor or intensity of expression
- he spoke with emphasis and with complete conviction
and optional from "optional dispute"
op·tion·al
adjective /ˈäpSHənl/

Available to be chosen but not OBLIGATORY
- a wide range of optional excursions is offered

I hope you realize that you are just going to get an extension for this, but deep down I know you don't.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Infracting because of "your interpretation of a request close"

My interpretation of requesting close? You did request close you moron. If BACKD00R, Jigsaw, and Liz(all who posted in your last thread) said it was also a post that requested close, how is it my interpretation? Why do you keep denying it?

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Moving my thread to staff Disputes
- I posted in wrong section

Yes, so I moved it. There's no point in having a dispute in CF Discussions. It's better to settle it here since we have upper staff that are here to deal with the dispute as well, and also that's the point of this section - if you feel that a staff member has made an oversight, then you make a thread here with all the details.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Banning me for a pointless dispute with staff member
- WHAT? Why did you move my thread to staff DISPUTES if you didn't want to discuss my infraction?
As far as the pointless dispute aspect goes, really...??? IF you did not believe that I had broken a rule then you wouldn't have infracted me
SO = wouldn't this entire forum be "pointless disputes"

First off, I did not ban you. I don't even have banning powers. It was moved because this is the proper section for it, not crossfire discussions. Also, I am not disputing your infraction, you are disputing your infraction. You made this thread because you are asking questions - specifically 'why was I infracted' or 'why was I banned'. We give you the answers and explanation. That is all. Of course, if you didn't break a rule, then why would I infract you? I would have no reason to infract you, but thinking about this present situation, you did do something wrong, so you were infracted.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Don't "optionally" dispute if your just going to ban them for "peacefully" responding with you

What do you mean optionally dispute? You thought of making the thread. You created the thread. You're asking for answers. Main issue: you're not accepting your mistake.

Responding 'peacefully'? Not sure where that has any relevancy to this. In a dispute, the person who is right - always gets the way. The one who responds 'peacefully' in a dispute doesn't get the way.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

P.S. " " is for emphasis not sarcasm
Definition of emphasis in case you didn't know
m·pha·sis
noun /ˈemfəsis/
emphases, plural

Special importance, value, or prominence given to something
- they placed great emphasis on the individual's freedom
- different emphases and viewpoints

Stress laid on a word or words to indicate special meaning or particular importance

Vigor or intensity of expression
- he spoke with emphasis and with complete conviction
and optional from "optional dispute"
op·tion·al
adjective /ˈäpSHənl/

Available to be chosen but not OBLIGATORY
- a wide range of optional excursions is offered

I don't know why you posted this (pretty useless imo).

Oh, also one more thing. If you think the ban you received was pointless, then take a look here: http://www.mpgh.net/forum/259-staff-...-disputes.html

This thread was your little warning for creating a pointless dispute. Looks like you decided to challenge that warning. Turns out it didn't end well, and it, in fact, will get worse for you.

Okay then who banned me for pointless dispute?

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Okay then who banned me for pointless dispute?

That I don't know, but my guess would be Liz.

[QUOTE=Hero;6283161][FONT="Franklin Gothic Medium"][COLOR="Black"][SIZE="2"]

I don't know why you posted this (pretty useless imo).
/QUOTE]

Not pretty useless If I was challenging why I was banned over having a pointless dispute; considering disputing was the point of this thread. I at least had a logical if invalid argument. So no it was not a pointless dispute. I had many points that I clearly pointed out.

P.S. I thought when you were ban it listed the staff member?

Edit: / mild flare
Look at my join date I have been here 3 years. And ever since then MPGH has been adding more rules. Having a specific thread for flamers? This is the internet not a zidscom chat room! MPGH acts like jagex when it comes to rules. That's why you stopped having really good hacks a long time ago when you started banning members who posted cracked VIP and the FC modz bunch.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Not pretty useless If I was challenging why I was banned over having a pointless dispute; considering disputing was the point of this thread. I at least had a logical if invalid argument. So no it was not a pointless dispute. I had many points that I clearly pointed out.

P.S. I thought when you were ban it listed the staff member?

The reason why it was a pointless dispute was because the reason I infracted you was very evident in your post. Most people would say the same thing. So, you put the pieces together, purpose of the thread: dispute. Reason of creation: pointless.

And no, it will not say who banned you.

That's why you come here whenever you want questions answered, and whenever you feel that you were wrongly banned or infracted, an addition, asking who banned you. However, this is only if you are sure you have been wrongly banned. If the reason is obvious, then do not create a thread. You'll end up getting banned.

Also, there is this thread: http://www.mpgh.net/forum/259-staff-...nce-rules.html

If you are unaware of a rule, then it's too bad.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Edit: / mild flare
Look at my join date I have been here 3 years. And ever since then MPGH has been adding more rules. Having a specific thread for flamers? This is the internet not a zidscom chat room! MPGH acts like jagex when it comes to rules. That's why you stopped having really good hacks a long time ago when you started banning members who posted cracked VIP and the FC modz bunch.

I don't know of a 'thread' for just flaming. :/ We have a Flaming and Rage section, but if you really rage hard, then you'll be banned.

The rules were soft before, but since people had gone out of control, more enforcement needed to be done. More rules needed to be in place. You can do what ever you want, unless it is under the guidelines.

In most cracked VIPs, you have advertisement. That is not allowed. I'm pretty sure it's been a rule here even before I registered on this site.

Originally Posted by Hero

That I don't know, but my guess would be Liz.

Does that ban without being over analyzed really make sense? I just thought if there was a stupid dispute then thread would be closed?

---------- Post added at 02:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Hero

I get your point but showing me a rule made by a banned member?

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Does that ban without being over analyzed really make sense? I just thought if there was a stupid dispute then thread would be closed?

It was analyzed alright. The person who banned you closed your previous thread with a response(meaning it was viewed).

Stupid, or pointless disputes. What ever floats your boat into calling it: http://www.mpgh.net/forum/259-staff-...-disputes.html

You'll be banned... Like I said, this thread I linked you is like your warning.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

I get your point but showing me a rule made by a banned member?

Don't really understand what you meant by that.

Originally Posted by Hero

Your original infrating of me was valid but Hairy. I think there was enough grey to warrant a dispute. Dispute was denied, thread closed I was done. Then they banned me for a pointless dispute. NO I read the threads on this forum my request was as valid if not more valid then the other threads on this forum. If you are going to ban people for pointless dispute in your opinion then don't have this section. To me this whole section is a trap for head moderators to use their power against the rules.

Edit:

Pointless Disputes
Pointless disputes will result in a ban.

These bans are only handed out by myself (Dave84311) and arunforce. Each dispute is reviewed by us even if it has been handled. If we do see a pointless dispute, we will extend the ban on your main and ban your alt.

You have been warned.

This is the worst rule I have ever seen. There is nothing wrong with having this rule, except it says nothing. What is a pointless thread? No examples of a good appeal vs a pointless one? There is no white no black NOR GREY!
Its like saying there is a speed limit - VIOLATORS WILL BE PROSECUTED
Whats the speed limit?????

Originally Posted by addcoolman

It was pointless bro. Your post broke a rule and it was very evident. I don't know why you're not understanding.
This is not any 'trap' or anything. You broke a rule and that's that.

She(Liz) banned you accordingly.

You're basically asking for a ban extension.

Originally Posted by Hero

It was pointless bro. Your post broke a rule and it was very evident. I don't know why you're not understanding.
Not everyone gets banned for pointless disputes. You only get banned when it's highly evident. This is not any 'trap' or anything. Nothing was against the rules. You broke a rule and that's that.

She(Liz) banned you accordingly.

You're basically asking for a ban extension.

You can't have rules without explaining them.
I live in Ohio.
If I go driving in a residential neighborhood and i'm doing 60 cause there is no speed limit sign and a cop says hey ur doing 60
I'm like there is no speed limit sign.
He says ya but in the DMV digest of vehicle laws it says the maximum speed limit in a residential neighborhood is 25.
I get fined even though there was no speed limit sign

Don't you get it you cant have a rule posted if there is no detailed explanation available even if the writer look for one.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

You can't have rules without explaining them.
I live in Ohio.
If I go driving in a residential neighborhood and i'm doing 60 cause there is no speed limit sign and a cop says hey ur doing 60
I'm like there is no speed limit sign.
He says ya but in the DMV digest of vehicle laws it says the maximum speed limit in a residential neighborhood is 25.
I get fined even though there was no speed limit sign

Don't you get it you cant have a rule posted if there is no detailed explanation available even if the writer look for one.

The internet and real life are two different things.

You broke a rule on this site, deal with it, cop your punishment. It will make you a better person.

Acting like an idiot like you are now is just extending your ban, and it's also pretty humorous for the rest of us.

Originally Posted by Xipher

The internet and real life are two different things.

You broke a rule on this site, deal with it, cop your punishment. It will make you a better person.

Acting like an idiot like you are now is just extending your ban, and it's also pretty humorous for the rest of us.

Okay well if you guys are the cops then you are defiantly the ones from the Village People.

Originally Posted by addcoolman

Okay well if you guys are the cops then you are defiantly the ones from the Village People.

We're not cops, we're enforcers.
Oh and...
Look addcoolman, it's nyan cat walking down the street.

Tch, internet and real life. Tch tch tch tch tch :3

Banned?

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread