Well no shit, single cells organisms are still organisms
Originally Posted by Lehsyrus
Well no shit, single cells organisms are still organisms
i thought they were simply DNA strands, not actual living cells themselves
They're not living, they just have dna strands but no nucleus i think :/
Originally Posted by Obliteration
i thought they were simply DNA strands, not actual living cells themselves
You're specifically thinking of the mitochondria, but that has a form of encapsulation which is considered living material, even at a basic sub-standard level. Virus's don't thrive from the same situational constructs as multi-cells organisms as wel have different cells with different jobs all to keep one big human alive. Virus's only need to worry about having one small job beig a single felled organism, so many like to say it is not, bit the facts are that it is still a living organism on its own.
Originally Posted by Leggers
They're not living, they just have dna strands but no nucleus i think :/
does it need a nucleus to be considered a living organism?
were talking about if viruses count as a life form
Originally Posted by Obliteration
were talking about if viruses count as a life form
He's Arun's personal BR of course he can't follow along with the topic at hand
They're living. living (adj) active or thriving; vigorous; strong I think they are active, thriving, vigorous AND strong
No they are not alive. They do not have all 7 characteristics of life. They are complex pieces of organic machinery that mimic life when they hijack an organism's cellular machinery in order to replicate.