R0Nav 1.0

Originally Posted by Pi0j0

Well, the 32-bit version is finished, some guys of the forum tried it and goes well, no bans for the moment.
but i think that does not pass the validation process of this forum.
I encrypt the program to ensure continuity of the project. The antivirus detected the Themida packer.
Sorry but I will not post the program without encryption, I will try to find another packer.

https://www.virustotal.com/file/1f5e...is/1351836857/

I seem to have a minor issue with the key...perhaps you gave out the same key twice?

Originally Posted by Malkiot

I seem to have a minor issue with the key...perhaps you gave out the same key twice?

Mmm i dont think so, contactme on skype plz.

Originally Posted by Karma1

Good luck to you, I'm really looking forward to not having my FPS killed from Navigator, unless it is an unfixable problem. How difficult would it be to lower the time it takes to load into a server from what it was with Navigator? I would get kicked for lobby idling too long on a lot of servers I play on.

You can decrease the loading time by unticking the "Auto Refresh" in Navigator as sd has said many many times you must do it before loading the map otherwise it will not work, when the game has loaded just tick the Auto Refresh again and done. Loads as normal.

I am writing to confirm that this works great! Although I was having a few problems at the start, PiOjO helped me fix all of them and was very patient. Many thanks!

When does a public version comes out?

Originally Posted by Linx2000

When does a public version comes out?

Hopefully it won't, I don't want something like this ever being sent to the masses.

Originally Posted by Linx2000

When does a public version comes out?

Originally Posted by Pi0j0

Well, the 32-bit version is finished, some guys of the forum tried it and goes well, no bans for the moment.
but i think that does not pass the validation process of this forum.
I encrypt the program to ensure continuity of the project. The antivirus detected the Themida packer.
Sorry but I will not post the program without encryption, I will try to find another packer.

https://www.virustotal.com/file/1f5e...is/1351836857/

I'm trying to talk to an administrator to resolve this but no answer.

---------- Post added at 05:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:17 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Lachdanen

How much gold to become a VIP?

gold? for you 15 kilograms hahah

How much gold to become a VIP?

Have sent you a message on Skype

Darn I have x64 bit comp, I'd be happy too test for a x64 Bit if you are making.

Originally Posted by barnard401

this works great! Although I was having a few problems at the start, PiOjO helped me fix all of them and was very patient. Many thanks!

same he gave me alot of his time getting this work ... works with no problems ...exept the serails are allways in use

I will help you test it! I have a couple of keys so I don't mind.

Tested the 32-bit version, works great been using it for the last couple of days! The only problem i have had, is that recently its stated telling me that my key was in use or that the amount of users for that key have been reached???

well i had 2h using it, till my pc crashed (dont know why normaly never crashes),and now since 2days im trying get in again

...no matter when i try it all the time sireal in use

pi0j0, glad to hear that this works on 32 bit.

Is it possible for you to kernel patch on 64 bit, but determine the interval at which windows scans, and discontinue the kernel right before it scans it, and then re-enable after it scans through the clean code?

Information

It works by periodically checking to make sure that protected system structures in the kernel have not been modified. If a modification is detected, then Windows will initiate a bug check and shut down the system, with a blue screen and/or reboot. The corresponding bugcheck number is 0x109, the bugcheck code is CRITICAL_STRUCTURE_CORRUPTION. Prohibited modifications include:

Modifying system service tables
Modifying the interrupt descriptor table
Modifying the global descriptor table
Using kernel stacks not allocated by the kernel
Modifying or patching code contained within the kernel itself, or the HAL or NDIS kernel libraries

It should be noted that Kernel Patch Protection only defends against device drivers modifying the kernel. It does not offer any protection against one device driver patching another.

Tags for this Thread