read
Please read this and tell answer http://www.mpgh.net/forum/268-revers...ml#post6998605
read
First of all:
Fuck you for shoving this in general's face.
Second of all, niggah it totally depends on how it was protected. With that said though, you can prolly just place a detour on writeprocessmemory, because I am lazy, I'd probably just do a kernel-level breakpoint to avoid any of the user-land protection methods used.
Fuck you for shoving this in general's face.
Second of all, niggah it totally depends on how it was protected. With that said though, you can prolly just place a detour on writeprocessmemory, because I am lazy, I'd probably just do a kernel-level breakpoint to avoid any of the user-land protection methods used.
--------_____________--------------
Originally Posted by radnomguywfq3
Originally Posted by radnomguywfq3
First of all:
Fuck you for shoving this in general's face.
Second of all, niggah it totally depends on how it was protected. With that said though, you can prolly just place a detour on writeprocessmemory, because I am lazy, I'd probably just do a kernel-level breakpoint to avoid any of the user-land protection methods used.
Fuck you for shoving this in general's face.
Second of all, niggah it totally depends on how it was protected. With that said though, you can prolly just place a detour on writeprocessmemory, because I am lazy, I'd probably just do a kernel-level breakpoint to avoid any of the user-land protection methods used.
This is general
U cant reverse if iits protected
