Should I code for combat arms section?

I see that C.A section has been SO dead, I don't really play it, but I can code for it just to bring it back to life a bit, I'd like to see your opinions on this, and see who even sees this posts, that just means you are a real mpgh.net user.

You should code for the combat arms section to make this section more lively.

That's ONE person, once i get 6 replies on this post, witch means there are atleast a few people who still use mpgh for C.A then I will, I can't work for all I know ONE person who will use it..

Yea you should code for CA, this section has been so dead.

That's (two); 4 more.

One more^^

That's (THREE); 3 more to go.

It's been dead and will stay dead, Combat Arms was a FPS that refused to put money back into its graphics engine and ideas so now everyone else has moved onto better FPS games >.>

More then 6 people will use your hacks. But most ONLY come here for the hacks, they do not even glance at threads.

I mean..look at the views and thanks hacks get,
then look at the views/replies threads in this section get.

Yes, Yes, Yes.
there's 3 from me right there.

(SIX!) And I got a fraction notice from an administrator....wtf? That was dumb? This is the discussion section soo...

hell ya start coding

Alright, deals a deal, I post as soon as it's done and tested.

What are you going to bring to the table? Is it going to be like basic stuff (Chams, EXP, Activation, Ect.) or are they going to be higher grade (ghost, aimbot, shoot thru, Ext.)?

Also If you need a tester I can help you with that.

For right now, I think am I just gona stick with basics, cham, aimbot, no recoil, no spread, opk, and noclip, AND for my first time of trying this new idea I had, I think it's possible to code for C.A is an exp booster..

Should I code for combat arms section?

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread