thingHACKER for CS?

Me and a few other members of MPGH believe that @thingHACKER should get CS for his stupidity and spamming on MPGH.

How about a big 'ole knock of the ban hammer.

Why CS when there are bans?

Originally Posted by Vice-Versa

Why CS when there are bans?

I love you man No homo.

#BanthingHacker2013

Just ban him, CS doesn't teach ignorant fucks like him to behave.

What Vice said.

I'm new to MPGH and I've seen it quite a lot.

+CS

Originally Posted by Instagram

I love you man No homo.

#BanthingHacker2013

#BanthingHacker2012

2013 is too mainstream.

We can't decide the rules. But i believe he'll get the infraction/bans he deserves. Just report his shit stating the appropriate rules and go on. But i've never seen about CS adherence rules. But if it goes like this..

Full on yup. The single conversation and all the posts i've seen from him are beyond low-standards.

Why don't you just get Dave, Arun or Liz to decide? This thread isn't going to go anywhere and will be closed eventually by staff

Originally Posted by Hugo Boss

Why don't you just get Dave, Arun or Liz to decide? This thread isn't going to go anywhere and will be closed eventually by staff

Nothing gets closed in general

Just because someone is annoying or is spamming doesn't mean they deserve CS.

That's like saying all the members that break the rules on MPGH should get CS instead of an infraction or a ban.

thingHACKER for CS?

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread