Hex's Anti-Cheat & CFG Source Code

Posts 16–30 of 33 · Page 2 of 3

123

Originally Posted by Tomeno

I am not sure what you mean by that, but iirc you get insta-VACd for darkstorm anyways.

You're retarded.

Originally Posted by Tomeno

I am not sure what you mean by that, but iirc you get insta-VACd for darkstorm anyways.

I think he means that VAC is a joke on gmod, it might pick it up but not likely, a shitty public ac is more likely to pick you up than VAC

Originally Posted by JDawg147

The sad part is that it doesn't check for anything you listed, the thing only in there it does do is screenshots.

You're probably too retarded to understand how it works.

Originally Posted by JDawg147

Yes, but then GAC could blacklist that exe's filename if you made it public.

Anyone intelligent enough would not release anything 'good' to feed skids.

Originally Posted by JDawg147

There are very very few things that'll cause a VAC ban in GMod, and modifying client.dll is one of them I believe. (I'm 50/50 on that one)

Just don't touch << too much >> the .text region and you're fine, ******.

Originally Posted by JDawg147

GMod's VAC doesn't do anything about injected DLLs, unless you hook DirectX.

What the fuck are you even saying, you can hook DirectX safely, retard.

Conclusion? Stop misinformating people. You make yourself look stupid.

Also,

Originally Posted by Tomeno

Aaaalso I'm pretty sure that dll hacks have to be injected into the game. But what if we made a copy of a game core dll but with the hack in it? That way it will be automatically loaded at game start. It might have problems with Steam though.

you're going to need the source code of the binary in order to paste your hack in.

Originally Posted by TroubleMakers

you're going to need the source code of the binary in order to paste your hack in.

No. You can use a code cave.

EDIT: Just push the name of the file and call LoadLibraryA.

Loading the hack.

View of loaded modules.

You have to put all your hacking stuff in DllMain, which is the entry point called after LoadLibraryA, I think. I don't know how you guys will get the Lua state from there, lol good luck. Anyways, the point being, you insert that somewhere into a module loaded by Garry's Mod, jump to it, and jump back after loading your module.

I believe tdsx is correct, although code cave is just a place to store run-time-generated code it's better then using dlls to inject and considering it is a self-modifying code so it would be scrambled or randomized. (Correct me if I missed something)
And TroubleMakers, there is no need to insult or flame at other people if they don't know something or the fact that it might be incorrect, that's just being plain rude and it's not appreciated. Maybe you could just tell them how they are incorrect a nicer way, that would be appreciated.

Jesus christ, this is giving me a headache so let me clear it up.

1. Modifying "client.dll" WILL NOT get you VAC banned. (In GMod.)

2. DirectX hooking CAN get you VAC banned IF it's done incorrectly, but it's very difficult to fuck up.

3. JMP hooking CAN get you VAC banned IF it's done incorrectly.

4. Externally drawing menus WILL not protect you from screenshots, render.Capture will draw the entire window.

5. Seed detection + Aimbot detection can be bypassed in HeX's AC.

6. Seed = "Verifying CUserCmd" there isn't really any other way to check it (that I know of.) directly from GLua.

7. Fakelag detection is a fucking stupid method of detecting a cheat, it's just a loss of packets, therefore, anyone losing packets will get caught (HeX wouldn't do this in the first place.)

8. Touching the .text section AT ALL can, and most likely WILL get you VAC banned, only .data and .rdata are safe to modify.

9. (This is directed toward Meep, who thinks they know so much about everything.)

Meep thinks this is not render.DrawWireframeBox, I can tell you, it is, I fucking made the cheat, I know what's in it.

Originally Posted by TheyCallMeDaz

9. (This is directed toward Meep, who thinks they know so much about everything.)

Meep thinks this is not render.DrawWireframeBox, I can tell you, it is, I fucking made the cheat, I know what's in it.

Ah, it looked like my old hack so I assumed it was mine. Mine used surface.* functions and no render.* functions. Judging by the name of the video I thought it was you showing off how "awesome" you are by getting my leaked hack and using it. Not my fault you are a ****** who only c+ps and calls everyone else a c+per.

Originally Posted by MeepDarknessMeep

I'm a ****** who C+Ps? Oh dear, you're the one using a surface class when you're using the SDK, why do you do that? It's all there alreadyyyyyyy :^)

Originally Posted by TheyCallMeDaz

I'm a ****** who C+Ps? Oh dear, you're the one using a surface class when you're using the SDK, why do you do that? It's all there alreadyyyyyyy :^)

i'm not even using the sdk wtf are you high or something

Originally Posted by MeepDarknessMeep

i'm not even using the sdk wtf are you high or something

You're not using the SDK? Then what are you using for your cheat? Last I heard you were drawing over the Steam Overlay and had your own Surface class while you were using the SDK, oh dearrrrrrrrrr :^)

Originally Posted by TheyCallMeDaz

wtf are you talking about lol

Originally Posted by MeepDarknessMeep

wtf are you talking about lol

You must be delusional to have forgotten, maybe your brain doesn't know how to C+P it over into memory because you have so much stolen code stuck in your head.

Originally Posted by TheyCallMeDaz

You must be delusional to have forgotten, maybe your brain doesn't know how to C+P it over into memory because you have so much stolen code stuck in your head.

.prove it.

Originally Posted by MeepDarknessMeep

.prove it.

Remember the time you stole your prediction last year in October and you couldn't even explain how it worked beyond "physics?" I'd imagine you don't because you're delusional.

Tip: Everyone else does.