Should 'Thanks' be disabled for release client threads?

It is simply unbelievable to see that people who repost Jnoobs work in simply a client form get over hundreds of likes. They leech their work and they get credit for it? That's complete bullshit. I want to see an option where if someone leeches something from someone else, thanks should be disabled. That is the only reason people release it. They don't care about 'People who don't know/can't run the program' they just want the thanks that makes their credibility look better. It's fucking bullshit. Jnoobs client is workable across all types of desktops therefore clients should not be needed at all.
>Delete all the threads of clients
>Make Orape a sticky

Others stealing credit for someone elses work and the mods allow it here? That's cute.
And for the love of god, please don't say 'We always allow 1 client and no more' there is no reason for any clients since he has the tool that works for mac linux and windows. He even has a tutorial showing how to do it....

Similar to what I suggested before, as 059(i think?) said people who can't run use a simple java application shouldn't be allowed to have free hacks.

What I suggest is that we enforce a 'No Orape client' rule, similar to the modselectors. A client could be added to the Orape thread with every update.

EDIT: Voted the butthurt option anyway for the lulz

EDIT 2: Inb4 22.5 Hacked Client via maat AIO Tool

The thread could be deleted after the client becomes outdated. That causes the uploader to lose the thanks gained. Also we wouldn't lose anything if it was just an orape client.

Originally Posted by CrazyJani

The thread could be deleted after the client becomes outdated. That causes the uploader to lose the thanks gained. Also we wouldn't lose anything if it was just an orape client.

Great Idea, so simple! How did I not think of that lol.

I think it's more logical just to stick to the often-discussed method of - 'No jNoob clients'.

1) I dont care.
2) I dont think its possible in the Vbulletin Thanks mod, but who knows
3) Its my personnal opinion, maybe other hacks makers have another one

I don't think it is necessary so I voted butthurt. Such trivial thing to discuss.

Originally Posted by TrapStars

I don't think it is necessary so I voted butthurt. Such trivial thing to discuss.

Of course it's trivial to you. You're a leecher and haven't contributed anything to the site therefore it doesn't bother you/the rest of the leechers. Even though I've contributed a chat spammer, it irritates me that other coders have their work stolen by others and they get the credit(aka thanks) for it.

Originally Posted by IAmDM

Of course it's trivial to you. You're a leecher and haven't contributed anything to the site therefore it doesn't bother you/the rest of the leechers. Even though I've contributed a chat spammer, it irritates me that other coders have their work stolen by others and they get the credit(aka thanks) for it.

Yes, I'm sure people get off by watching their thanks count increase.
It's a value/display on a remote server. Nothing more.

Originally Posted by IAmDM

Of course it's trivial to you. You're a leecher and haven't contributed anything to the site therefore it doesn't bother you/the rest of the leechers. Even though I've contributed a chat spammer, it irritates me that other coders have their work stolen by others and they get the credit(aka thanks) for it.

Lol you're embarrassing. Why are you crying over a "thank button"? It's funny how you think you're so smart just because you code, read my signature loser.

If you can't respect someone's opinion you better stop making public threads smartass.

Edit- Funny how a single user thanked all your posts.

Originally Posted by TrapStars

Lol you're embarrassing. Why are you crying over a "thank button"? It's funny how you think you're so smart just because you code, read my signature loser.

If you can't respect someone's opinion you better stop making public threads smartass.

Edit- Funny how a single user thanked all your posts.

Lol, listen here kiddo; You are keen proof of a leecher. You use insults rather than factual evidance to make an arugement which isn't even an arguement, its just your attempt to insult someone. If I call you a leecher, that is my opinion. You seem to not know how others can also have an opinion since you have taken yours to the heart. Grow up.

Originally Posted by Raple

Considering it isn't possible, this is all trivial nonsense. If Dave won't allow private sections for hacks, he won't allow specific threads to be thanked.

Get real here.

But you are the mod and you are the one who controls and watches the section. You are the one who says "We'll allow one client of orape here etc" and you can say no clients. Instead, I see you enticing the 'RAPLES MOM' character instead which is none realm related but continue the illogical nonsense of that thread.

Close the thread. I see this section has lost all the interesting souls it had two years ago back when the Trinity client was big. Shameful.

Originally Posted by IAmDM

Lol, listen here kiddo; You are keen proof of a leecher and a ******. You use insults rather than factual evidance to make an arugement which isn't even an arguement, its just your attempt to insult someone. If I call you a leecher, that is my opinion. You seem to not know how others can also have an opinion since you have taken yours to the heart. Grow up.

When did I argue about your "Leeching ******" thing? You don't seem to know how to comprehend mr.butthurt

Do you want me to thank your every post?

Do not complain to MPGH for breaking your mouse's scroll

Considering it isn't possible, this is all trivial nonsense. If Dave won't allow private sections for hacks, he won't allow specific threads to be thanked.

Get real here.

Should 'Thanks' be disabled for release client threads?

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread