Looks low quality as fuck to me.
Other then that, text isn't very fitting at all.
Other then that, text isn't very fitting at all.
ArtA mesmerizing dive
Very nice!
as a whole the light sources are messed up on the focal and otherwise, the focal (render) should be rotated so the head is angled towards top right while the legs would hang almost straight down off to the side..;
Other then that I agree that this is a nice piece.. And I agree that you should credit the original maker @IV2B
Other then that I agree that this is a nice piece.. And I agree that you should credit the original maker @IV2B
Originally Posted by taken4time
as a whole the light sources are messed up on the focal and otherwise, the focal (render) should be rotated so the head is angled towards top right while the legs would hang almost straight down off to the side..;
Other then that I agree that this is a nice piece.. And I agree that you should credit the original maker @IV2B
Other then that I agree that this is a nice piece.. And I agree that you should credit the original maker @IV2B
Should i give credits twice? ò.ò
Originally Posted by taken4time
as a whole the light sources are messed up on the focal and otherwise, the focal (render) should be rotated so the head is angled towards top right while the legs would hang almost straight down off to the side..;
Other then that I agree that this is a nice piece.. And I agree that you should credit the original maker @IV2B
Other then that I agree that this is a nice piece.. And I agree that you should credit the original maker @IV2B
You can edit the render to have whatever lighting you want.
What he did her I see looks completely fine.
But then again
(( My opinion xD Originally Posted by Organized Chaos
I disagree completely.
You can edit the render to have whatever lighting you want.
What he did her I see looks completely fine.
But then again
(( My opinion xD Originally Posted by IV2B
Well i couldn't flip the render as i worked on the stock image (the one i linked), but i agree.
Should i give credits twice? ò.ò
Should i give credits twice? ò.ò
Originally Posted by taken4time
I was remarking on it in totality; IE; what you did & the modifications. and while you can edit the lighting, using a renders natural lighting is easier.. as it doesn't require much technical know-how
Twice would be a bit much, but Credit where credit is due..
Originally Posted by taken4time
I was remarking on it in totality; IE; what you did & the modifications. and while you can edit the lighting, using a renders natural lighting is easier.. as it doesn't require much technical know-how
Twice would be a bit much, but Credit where credit is due..
I made this piece @IV2B Just remade it...
Originally Posted by Organized Chaos
I think you might be confused or I am reading this wrong x.x
I made this piece @IV2B Just remade it...
Originally Posted by Organized Chaos
I think you might be confused or I am reading this wrong x.x
I made this piece @IV2B Just remade it...
Originally Posted by Doc
Are you saying you digipainted that? Because if you didn't then you didn't make it either. You're both appropriating someone else's artwork.
I MADE IT FROM SCRATCH OMGGG
Damn dude here's the fucking stock and render if you want them.
Actually can't find the render but here's the stock
@Doc @taken4time Originally Posted by Organized Chaos
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I MADE IT FROM SCRATCH OMGGG
Damn dude here's the fucking stock and render if you want them.
Actually can't find the render but here's the stock
@Doc @taken4timeIt's like picking up a painting, sneezing on it and saying it's yours.
Originally Posted by IV2B
Indeed, you're proving Doc's point: you used somebody else's work (the stock and the render), thus you didn't make it from scratch.
It's like picking up a painting, sneezing on it and saying it's yours.
It's like picking up a painting, sneezing on it and saying it's yours.
Originally Posted by Organized Chaos
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I MADE IT FROM SCRATCH OMGGG
Damn dude here's the fucking stock and render if you want them.
Actually can't find the render but here's the stock
@Doc @taken4timeThat's look so nice. I like it. 
