Originally Posted by Sam_Nicolas
Vac banned :'(
Originally Posted by Sam_Nicolas
Outdatedclockwork's tiny hacks #11e
Originally Posted by Sam_Nicolas
yes it does
Originally Posted by Brandon238
yes it does
Originally Posted by KingSeverus
Clockwork turn this hack into polyloader, that way you don't have to make a new one every 3 days.
Originally Posted by Augstakas
That'd be a horrible idea. Clockwork's hack is unique because it doesn't use polyloader. I know a handful of people who can't even operate those hacks because they are unable to download Visual Studio on their computers.
Competitive undetected? Btw works fine on Casual, As of 16/06/15
If it's undetectable on Casual then it's undetectable on any VAC-Secure server which is comp. So yes, it is UD on comp so far but be careful as the hacks are 3 days old
Originally Posted by T-800
CLockworks have an unique source code but Polyloader make a unique source code per User
Vavle could easily check all the source code get the hooks and make it detected.
- - - Updated - - -
Originally Posted by KingSeverus
Clockwork turn this hack into polyloader, that way you don't have to make a new one every 3 days.
Originally Posted by JDoawp
NO it doesn't Poly's source code is the same for all. It only "scrambles" and adds junk data to it.
Vavle could easily check all the source code get the hooks and make it detected.
- - - Updated - - -
Not possible and if it was wouldn't happen.
//also they could do that 4 months ago but they didn't anyway i don't believe
Originally Posted by T-800
I don't believe the part: "Vavle could easily check all the source code get the hooks and make it detected." but ok
Originally Posted by JDoawp
They could. Since the source is available you could look at it yourself. Dunno if it has a hook but I would assume so. (Not all hacks does). Either way if Vavle would want to they could make Poly's hacks DD within a few days.
//#1: and yeah in those vac waves (when valve could detect polyhacks) nothing happen and there was like 2 or 3 waves and is released since 4 months ago or more.
//#2: And also mercy said that VAC will can't detected those hacks only when they will change the scan type (recently they are scanning for sigs)
Originally Posted by T-800
I know you don't like Polyloader (really i know), but mercy and a lot of peoples who know how poly work said "is very hard for vac to detect it" and you say something new now. But anyway let's stop speaking about Polyloader and polyhacks in this thread
//#1: and yeah in those vac waves (when valve could detect polyhacks) nothing happen and there was like 2 or 3 waves and is released for 4 months or more. But no more about polyhacks here xD
//#2: And also mercy said that VAC will can't detected those hacks only when they will change the scan type (recently they are scanning for sigs)
//#1: and yeah in those vac waves (when valve could detect polyhacks) nothing happen and there was like 2 or 3 waves and is released for 4 months or more. But no more about polyhacks here xD
//#2: And also mercy said that VAC will can't detected those hacks only when they will change the scan type (recently they are scanning for sigs)
Originally Posted by JDoawp
They can scan for hooks as well and since open to the public they can ban on that. Then signatures won't matter since they detect if someone is using that hook to inject / redirect shit.
//if i said something work my bad but is too complicate for me now. For the moment i know something... Polyhacks can't be detect for the moment and my proof is Mercyy.
Originally Posted by T-800
Yes but is very hard for VAC to detect the "hook" because have a lot of "junks code". I really don't know how to say and i'm done xD. Too complicate for me now xD
i wasnt banned 15 minutes ago with vmsecure and hash scrambler,
UD or not?
UD or not?
This thread is closed for replies.
