Hack creation. WR or CA?

If this seems off topic or in the wrong forum, my bad. But I've noticed how Warrock has always had more hacks made by the public than CA. Is this because its easier to make them for WR or are [-]@X3R5 just not feelin the CA vibe?

CA For me i use Visual Studio C++

total rip of my thread alittle diff wow its obviously wr om fg woooooowwww

Warrock so dam easy to hack it. I made a pub that enables u with superjump, super zoom, no fall, and no recoil. Super easy to hack it.

I would say Combat Arms because I dont think that WarRock even gives a shit about anything anymore..well they might

I got the idea from it cuz i was wondering how much it had to do with hacks devs.

omg kevin ur a retard if they didnt care IT WOULD BE EASIER and theres hella lot more hax for warrock then ca only reason ca even is getting votes is cuz pple r stupid when its posted in ca section

all games are easy to hack it making a permant bypass thats hard.
also do u have any proof you can even hack wr? didnt think so

I think WR was harder to hack while it was with punkbuster, now that its not its easier but still i think CA hacks are easier to create. I also think people go for CA hacks is because its not made by users its made by the MPGH crew so its more reliable.

you guys flame to much...... they should really enforce that rule

CA seems harder becuz its easier to get detected (in my opinion) than punkbuster. But Pnkbstr banned u, Hackshield just boots you.