BF3 vs MW3

Battle field actually upgraded their game. Where as MW kept the same engine and frame rate...and just about everything else.

Tell me, besides jets and graphics, what did DICE actually add to the game?

What's the answer? Nothing. BF3 is nothing more than BC2 with a few minor upgrades, and much better graphics.



Its funny, because at the midnight release last night, they only had about 50 people show up where I was at. And this gamestop is a very busy one, so saying that only 50 some people showed up for a so called amazing AAA release is pretty sad.

And also, at the store I was at, there was only 200 some pre-order copies of BF3, but there are over 2000 pre-orders for MW3. They had a high school band and buffalo wings last night for BF3, and they are throwing a fucking block party for MW3. I think that says enough.

Uhhhh, the brand new engine and increased frame rates? Along with the vehicles, which might I add, MW doesnt have any. They actually drove Abrams tanks to tweak them in the game. I don't really know why your getting so upset over a game though.

Uhhhh, the brand new engine and increased frame rates? Along with the vehicles, which might I add, MW doesnt have any. They actually drove Abrams tanks to tweak them in the game. I don't really know why your getting so upset over a game though.

Did I say I was upset?

And considering vehicles where in BC2 as well, that's not exactly changing anything. And as for vehicles not being in MW, there is a reason for that. I'm assuming you can figure it out, but just in case you can't, go back and play W@W.

And they did not 'add more framerates durr'. They took their old engine, tweaked and updated it and slapped a 2 on the end. Exactly like CoD did with every single engine they have ever used. So perhaps you can stop attacking CoD for things that BF is completley guilty of as well?

What the hell? How does newer engine increase frame rates?