Question about bypassing

Cr0NiX · 2013-07-21T22:39:18.000Z

Wouldn't it be possible to make pickles bypass undetected by changing some things in the DLL, maybe encrypting it or something and changing the name?

Originally Posted by D3M0L1T10N

another one of these threads, yup time to make a thread.

edit: making a thread right now

---------- Post added at 06:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 PM ----------

Check out my thread http://www.mpgh.net/forum/713-garrys...od-update.html tell me if it's any useful.

Yes it's useful.
Many less questions should pop out now ^.^

Originally Posted by D3M0L1T10N

another one of these threads, yup time to make a thread.

edit: making a thread right now

---------- Post added at 06:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 PM ----------

Check out my thread http://www.mpgh.net/forum/713-garrys...od-update.html tell me if it's any useful.

That thread didn't answer my question though, I just wanted to know if modifying the dll would decrease the chances of it being detected.

Originally Posted by Cr0NiX

That thread didn't answer my question though, I just wanted to know if modifying the dll would decrease the chances of it being detected.

Probably not, but if your that paranoid you can rename the .dll to My Application and same with the bypasser that's what I did, no idea if it worked.

Originally Posted by D3M0L1T10N

Probably not, but if your that paranoid you can rename the .dll to My Application and same with the bypasser that's what I did, no idea if it worked.

Alright, I'll try what you said to do in your thread, at least we'll be banned together if it turns out it is detected <3

Originally Posted by Cr0NiX

Alright, I'll try what you said to do in your thread, at least we'll be banned together if it turns out it is detected <3

lmao i've been *********** on stronghold etc with lots of hacks on, still not banned.

edit: haha wow, that acctualy got censored. rage hacking.

Originally Posted by D3M0L1T10N

lmao i've been *********** on stronghold etc with lots of hacks on, still not banned.

edit: haha wow, that acctualy got censored. rage hacking.

lol, i thought you said permabanned.

Originally Posted by Cr0NiX

That thread didn't answer my question though, I just wanted to know if modifying the dll would decrease the chances of it being detected.

It should help,but probably it won't be any effective.

adding comments inside the code helps avoid detection,also changing the process' name or/and the file's name to something usual on a PC should help.

Originally Posted by IV2B

It should help,but probably it won't be any effective.

adding comments inside the code helps avoid detection,also changing the process' name or/and the file's name to something usual on a PC should help.

lmao no it doesnt the compiler ignores comments, thats why they are comments

Originally Posted by wuat

lmao no it doesnt the compiler ignores comments, thats why they are comments

I meant to add stuff that does nothing,like adding a variable wich isn't used.
Also,i'm pretty sure a compiled file without comment is a little different that one with a comment.
I may be wrong but i've tested it with DevC++ while being bored at school.

But HEY...maybe DevC++ just sucks hard...lolol...

Question about bypassing

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread