Hex's Anti-Cheat & CFG Source Code

Here's the source code for Hex's Anti-Cheat, do whatever you want with the code.
Although I will warn you.. this is Anti-Cheat has over 6600+ lines of code if you were planning to make a bypasser or do
anything in particular with the Source Code.
Source Code: http://pastebin.com/SiBMeDiq
CFG File Source Code http://pastebin.com/UJdEpXJY

Originally Posted by Kingofultima

Here's the source code for Hex's Anti-Cheat, do whatever you want with the code.
Although I will warn you.. this is Anti-Cheat has over 6600+ lines of code if you were planning to make a bypasser or do
anything in particular with the Source Code.
Source Code: http://pastebin.com/SiBMeDiq
CFG File Source Code http://pastebin.com/UJdEpXJY

nice, but isn't hex releasing this anyway?

Well probably not necessarily since I believe he's pushing to the side were he just won't release it to the public. He might who knows what events might happen in a future time, but for now that is the main source code.

Originally Posted by Kingofultima

Well probably not necessarily since I believe he's pushing to the side were he just won't release it to the public. He might who knows what events might happen in a future time, but for now that is the main source code.

idk, i just heard from some people that he is planning on releasing it but we will just have to find out

Originally Posted by wisezombieking

idk, i just heard from some people that he is planning on releasing it but we will just have to find out

He is. He said so himself. It doesn't really matter, though. This is a nice release.

http://unitedhosts.org/bar/end/
He is.
Anyways, nice release.

Originally Posted by Prometheois117

http://unitedhosts.org/bar/end/
He is.
Anyways, nice release.

That is really depressing, but I completely agree with him

So he really is going through with the release, well I'll them him one huge vulnerability in his Anti-Cheat that he should fix.
Since it relies mostly on DLL Injections and Lua scripts if you were to make a hack or bypasser that left no traces and also didn't inject into the hl2.exe process,
Well... lets just say the anti-cheat would meet QAC's fate that's all I'm going to describe at the moment.

Originally Posted by Kingofultima

So he really is going through with the release, well I'll them him one huge vulnerability in his Anti-Cheat that he should fix.
Since it relies mostly on DLL Injections and Lua scripts if you were to make a hack or bypasser that left no traces and also didn't inject into the hl2.exe process,
Well... lets just say the anti-cheat would meet QAC's fate that's all I'm going to describe at the moment.

If you just ported a C++ hack (DarkStorm namely), HeX's "L33T" Anti-Cheat wouldn't be able to detect it automaticly of course he could still screencap you or just manually add you to the banlist.

Originally Posted by JDawg147

If you just ported a C++ hack (DarkStorm namely), HeX's "L33T" Anti-Cheat wouldn't be able to detect it automaticly of course he could still screencap you or just manually add you to the banlist.

Seed Detection,
Screenshots,
Aimbot Detection,
Fakelag Detection,
(probably) CUserCmd Verification,
(probably) Speedhack Detection,
and even more.

Since it does use hud_takesshots and hud_freezecamhide I think there is a possible way to hide the hacks from showing up in the screenshots.

Originally Posted by Kingofultima

Since it does use hud_takesshots and hud_freezecamhide I think there is a possible way to hide the hacks from showing up in the screenshots.

You'd be able to bypass screencaps by having an external menu, right?

Originally Posted by Kingofultima

So he really is going through with the release, well I'll them him one huge vulnerability in his Anti-Cheat that he should fix.
Since it relies mostly on DLL Injections and Lua scripts if you were to make a hack or bypasser that left no traces and also didn't inject into the hl2.exe process,
Well... lets just say the anti-cheat would meet QAC's fate that's all I'm going to describe at the moment.

Aaaalso I'm pretty sure that dll hacks have to be injected into the game. But what if we made a copy of a game core dll but with the hack in it? That way it will be automatically loaded at game start. It might have problems with Steam though.

Originally Posted by JDawg147

If you just ported a C++ hack (DarkStorm namely), HeX's "L33T" Anti-Cheat wouldn't be able to detect it automaticly of course he could still screencap you or just manually add you to the banlist.

You'd get banned by VAC.

Originally Posted by Tomeno

You'd get banned by VAC.

L...O...L....

Originally Posted by TroubleMakers

Seed Detection,
Screenshots,
Aimbot Detection,
Fakelag Detection,
(probably) CUserCmd Verification,
(probably) Speedhack Detection,
and even more.

The sad part is that it doesn't check for anything you listed, the thing only in there it does do is screenshots.

Originally Posted by Tomeno

You'd be able to bypass screencaps by having an external menu, right?

Yes, but then GAC could blacklist that exe's filename if you made it public.

Originally Posted by Tomeno

Aaaalso I'm pretty sure that dll hacks have to be injected into the game. But what if we made a copy of a game core dll but with the hack in it? That way it will be automatically loaded at game start. It might have problems with Steam though.

There are very very few things that'll cause a VAC ban in GMod, and modifying client.dll is one of them I believe. (I'm 50/50 on that one)

Originally Posted by Tomeno

You'd get banned by VAC.

GMod's VAC doesn't do anything about injected DLLs.

Originally Posted by MeepDarknessMeep

L...O...L....

I am not sure what you mean by that, but iirc you get insta-VACd for darkstorm anyways.

Hex's Anti-Cheat & CFG Source Code

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread