Deobfuscating a private function.

Name of the function: percentLoop(_arg_1:TimerEvent):void

Located in kabam.rotmg.account.web.view.MigrationDialog

Code:

		private function percentLoop(event:TimerEvent) : void {
			var params:Object = this.account.getCredentials();
			this.progressCheckClien*****mplete.addOnce(this.onUpdateStatusComplete);
			this.progressCheckClient.sendRequest("/migrate/progress",params);
		}

Originally Posted by 059

Code:

		private function percentLoop(event:TimerEvent) : void {
			var params:Object = this.account.getCredentials();
			this.progressCheckClien*****mplete.addOnce(this.onUpdateStatusComplete);
			this.progressCheckClient.sendRequest("/migrate/progress",params);
		}

why does ur pfp look like 069 :P (no offence, it looks cool tho)

Originally Posted by thisisnotme6969

why does ur pfp look like 069 :P (no offence, it looks cool tho)

xd no reason, I had a few I created but ps didn't save them...

Originally Posted by citydrifter

xd no reason, I had a few I created but ps didn't save them...

He didnt talk to you, lol.

The clients been fully simplified for a very long time, what exactly were you seeing in your client source that made you think it was obfuscated?

Also did 059 answer your question? Is this needing to be closed now?
I'm still a bit curious how different the function looked in your client though compared to what 059 shared with you lmao.

Originally Posted by Riigged

Yes, 059 answered it in code xd. Client compiles doesn't necessarily mean it's simplified. For example if you want to copy & paste some big stuff from crazy to 059 or even vanilla, vice versa. The code might have different _arg_ and _loc_ etc. I also discovered by experimenting some decompilers tend to generate different _loc_ and _arg_, this still sometimes compiles but the original code should have the param(s) and whatever else.

Like if you want to add your code or delete AS code, you wouldn't know unless you know what those var_locals_mean. So if you want to make a hack (for anything)you would typically have to understand the code. Sorry for the ramble, just trying to figure stuff out, correct me If I am wrong.

This code will compile in my source but it's hard for a typical human to work with...lol

Code:

public function calculateUVMatrix(_arg_1:Vector.<Number>):void{
            if (this.texture_ == null)
            {
                this.uvMatrix_ = null;
                return;
            }
            var _local_2:int = (_arg_1.length - 3);
            var _local_3:Number = (_arg_1[0] * this.texture_.width);
            var _local_4:Number = (_arg_1[1] * this.texture_.height);
            var _local_5:Number = (_arg_1[3] * this.texture_.width);
            var _local_6:Number = (_arg_1[4] * this.texture_.height);
            var _local_7:Number = (_arg_1[_local_2] * this.texture_.width);
            var _local_8:Number = (_arg_1[(_local_2 + 1)] * this.texture_.height);
            var _local_9:Number = (_local_5 - _local_3);
            var _local_10:Number = (_local_6 - _local_4);
            var _local_11:Number = (_local_7 - _local_3);
            var _local_12:Number = (_local_8 - _local_4);
            this.uvMatrix_ = new Matrix(_local_9, _local_10, _local_11, _local_12, _local_3, _local_4);
            this.uvMatrix_.invert();
        }

Originally Posted by citydrifter

Code:

public function calculateUVMatrix(_arg_1:Vector.<Number>):void{
            if (this.texture_ == null)
            {
                this.uvMatrix_ = null;
                return;
            }
            var _local_2:int = (_arg_1.length - 3);
            var _local_3:Number = (_arg_1[0] * this.texture_.width);
            var _local_4:Number = (_arg_1[1] * this.texture_.height);
            var _local_5:Number = (_arg_1[3] * this.texture_.width);
            var _local_6:Number = (_arg_1[4] * this.texture_.height);
            var _local_7:Number = (_arg_1[_local_2] * this.texture_.width);
            var _local_8:Number = (_arg_1[(_local_2 + 1)] * this.texture_.height);
            var _local_9:Number = (_local_5 - _local_3);
            var _local_10:Number = (_local_6 - _local_4);
            var _local_11:Number = (_local_7 - _local_3);
            var _local_12:Number = (_local_8 - _local_4);
            this.uvMatrix_ = new Matrix(_local_9, _local_10, _local_11, _local_12, _local_3, _local_4);
            this.uvMatrix_.invert();
        }

What I meant was that a while ago Deca made their client fully deobfuscated meaning all the "localX" were changed to actual variable names that were understandable. But yeah 059 and CC are super old clients and both created using Jpexs/AS3 sorc to extract the source so I see why its filled with all those weird variables. Anyways, you solve your problem?

Originally Posted by Riigged

Yes. You may close.

Kk closed//2short//

Deobfuscating a private function.

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread